Broken pipe errors using guile-pg with guile 1.8

2009-02-23 Thread Sebastian Tennant
Hi Guilers, Is anyone familiar with the internals of guile-pg (version 0.16, author Ian Grant) which wraps PostgreSQL's libpq? I'm getting a lot of 'broken pipe' errors of the sort: Feb 23 11:32:13 stderr: ERROR: In procedure pg-connectdb: Feb 23 11:32:13 stderr: ERROR: could not send startup

Re: Broken pipe errors using guile-pg with guile 1.8

2009-02-23 Thread Greg Troxel
Sebastian Tennant writes: > Hi Guilers, > > Is anyone familiar with the internals of guile-pg (version 0.16, author > Ian Grant) which wraps PostgreSQL's libpq? By 0.16, I think you mean ttn's version of Ian Grant's abandoned 0.07 or so. > I'm getting a lot of 'broken pipe' errors of the sort:

Re: Broken pipe errors using guile-pg with guile 1.8

2009-02-23 Thread Sebastian Tennant
Quoth Greg Troxel : > Sebastian Tennant writes: >> Is anyone familiar with the internals of guile-pg (version 0.16, author >> Ian Grant) which wraps PostgreSQL's libpq? > > By 0.16, I think you mean ttn's version of Ian Grant's abandoned 0.07 or > so. It's the version shipped by Debian (deb modif

Re: Thoughts on g-wrap, guile FFI and guile-gnome

2009-02-23 Thread Andy Wingo
Hello! Your insights in reverse: On Sat 21 Feb 2009 03:52, Andreas Rottmann writes: > it might make sense to provide a pure-Scheme FFI inside Guile core > (perhaps just molding the current G-Wrap runtime library into shape). > Once you have that, you can create bindings without the need for any

Re: Thoughts on g-wrap, guile FFI and guile-gnome

2009-02-23 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Andy Wingo writes: > Hello! > > Your insights in reverse: > > On Sat 21 Feb 2009 03:52, Andreas Rottmann writes: > >> it might make sense to provide a pure-Scheme FFI inside Guile core >> (perhaps just molding the current G-Wrap runtime library into shape). >> Once you have that, you can create

Re: Broken pipe errors using guile-pg with guile 1.8

2009-02-23 Thread Greg Troxel
Sebastian Tennant writes: > Quoth Greg Troxel : >> Sebastian Tennant writes: >> >> By 0.16, I think you mean ttn's version of Ian Grant's abandoned 0.07 or >> so. > On closer inspection, it probably is the version you're referring to as > ttn is the author of all the supplementary postgres-*.sc