Hello!
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we went wrong in the 1.4->1.6 and 1.6->1.8 transitions, by
> leaving /source files/ to bitrot. We should have provided
> guile-1.6-compat.[ch] and guile-1.8-compat.[ch] files for users to
> include in their source trees, wrapping e.g. the gh
Hi,
"Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It appears that the current port setting is lost, with each new
> thread. So, for example, if I set the current output port in the
> first 3 threads created, wait, and create a 4th thread, the
> current output port is not set in the fourth thread
2008/11/12 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Linas,
>
> "Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> void * scm_one (void *p)
>> {
>> prtdbg("thread one");
>> scm_c_eval_string ("(define x \"asddf\")\n");
>> }
>>
>> void * scm_two (void *p)
>> {
>> prtdbg("thread two")
Hi Han-Wen,
On Wed 12 Nov 2008 05:41, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One angle that we could take is time based release planning, like GNOME and
> Fedora do: plan to do one or two releases per year on a rigid
> schedule.
With GNOME there is also a difference, as you know: they d
Greets,
On Wed 12 Nov 2008 11:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I think we went wrong in the 1.4->1.6 and 1.6->1.8 transitions, by
>> leaving /source files/ to bitrot. We should have provided
>> guile-1.6-compat.[ch] and guile-1.8-compat
Hi all,
An elementary scheme problem from an elementary schemer...
I need to create multiple variable bindings from a list of symbols. The
value of the variables is unimportant. It's the 'names' of the
variables that matter.
In pseudo-scheme code:
(map (lambda (v) (define (eval v) "foo") '(
Hello!
Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What exactly happens when you 'define' a symbol?
In Guile (non-portable) terms, "(define foo 'bar)" is equivalent to:
(module-define! (current-module) 'foo 'bar)
or, at a lower-level:
(module-add! (current-module) 'foo (make-variable
Hi Linas,
"Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> void * scm_one (void *p)
> {
> prtdbg("thread one");
> scm_c_eval_string ("(define x \"asddf\")\n");
> }
>
> void * scm_two (void *p)
> {
> prtdbg("thread two");
> scm_c_eval_string ("(display x)\n");
> }
AFAICS, the
"Ludovic Courtès" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What exactly happens when you 'define' a symbol?
>
> But, just like "`eval' is evil", run-time symbol definition doesn't
> sound right. Surely, there are other ways that you could use to solve
>
> From: Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> guile> (define-macro (definer var val)
> `(define ,var ,val))
> guile> (definer 'foo "bar")
> guile> foo
> ERROR: Unbound variable: foo
> ABORT: (unbound-variable)
>
> No doubt this fails for the same reason this does:
>
> guile> (
Does anyone actually use threads with guile?
Or am I the first to do so?
Today, I got a new crash. I have multiple threads, which
are doing nothing but a bunch of define's, in parallel.
(They're loading scheme code from various files).
The stack trace is below. This is on guile-1.8.5
--linas
th
2008/11/12 Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Today, I got a new crash. I have multiple threads, which
> are doing nothing but a bunch of define's, in parallel.
> (They're loading scheme code from various files).
Studying the code just a little bit more, this looks like
a dopey and pointless er
I have a C library that I wrapped as gsubrs that get put into a Guile module.
The C library wants a library_init() function called when it is initialized and
a library_end() function called when it taken down.
(for the curious, it is specifically mysql_library_init() and
mysql_library_end().)
13 matches
Mail list logo
