Re: guile-db

2008-10-22 Thread Sebastian Tennant
Quoth Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It's less work to write the wrapper to ttn's version. Quoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> (define-module (pg whatever) >> #:export (guile-pg symbols ...)) >> >> (load-extension "libwhateverpg" "guile

Re: guile-db

2008-10-22 Thread Greg Troxel
Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes, this needs to be done, but there is quite a bit more work that >> has to happen. >> >> The C code uses features and interfaces from Guile 1.4 that are >> deprecated in 1.6 and completely removed in 1.8. You just can't >> compile and link the

Re: guile-db

2008-10-22 Thread David Séverin
Le Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:40:11 -0400, Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > ... > I do not have any idea about Debian packages. I would say that if > Debian is tracking 0.07 they are behind and probably should switch - it > has been 8 years. But I don't know if the 0.07 version works with 1.

Re: guile-db

2008-10-22 Thread Greg Troxel
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages than select the package name and release [stable, testing, unstable] you get this page: http://packages.debian.org/lenny/guile-pg Thanks. That page is missing links to the upstream homepage and distfile. But I grabbed the

Re: guile-db

2008-10-22 Thread Sebastian Tennant
Quoth Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> I think you are referring to guile-pg 0.07 >> >> I'm referring to whichever guile-pg you get when you issue the command >> 'apt-get install guile-pg' on a stock Debian box. > > Sorry, but that means you don't know Which version it is. Indeed it does. Bu