... That's a comment from coverage of the current England v South
Africa cricket match
(http://uk.cricinfo.com/talk/content/current/multimedia/360921.html).
But is Guile nothing without pace?
Well obviously it isn't "nothing", but I think Guile is perceived,
among both Scheme implementations and
My immediate reaction is that test suites aren't good benchmarks because
we will often want to add to test suites, while changing the benchmark
invalidates previous data so we will not want to change the benchmark.
Now, if you mean to use the test suite as a collection of
micro-benchmarks, so that
2008/7/13 Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My immediate reaction is that test suites aren't good benchmarks because
> we will often want to add to test suites, while changing the benchmark
> invalidates previous data so we will not want to change the benchmark.
Yes, but...
> Now, if you mean to
2008/7/13 Maciek Godek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> except that the last line fails with a "Bad define placement" error.
>> That's because there are special rules for defines inside lexical
>> scopes.
>
> As the practise shows, although guile documentation says something
> different. In section 3.1.4.7
>> As the practise shows, although guile documentation says something
>> different. In section 3.1.4.7 (A Shared Persistent Variable)
>>
>> "An important detail here is that the `get-balance' and `deposit'
>> variables must be set up by `define'ing them at top level and then
>> `set!'ing their valu
