Hi,
Mike Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are correct. There is a value in that macro called "_Complex_I" that is,
> for some reason, being processed down to "__I", losing the word "Complex".
`Complex' in `_Complex_I' can't possibly be macro-expanded. There must
be something else.
Thank
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 13:59 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mike Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You are correct. There is a value in that macro called "_Complex_I" that
> > is, for some reason, being processed down to "__I", losing the word
> > "Complex".
>
> `Complex' in `_Co
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 10:10 -0800, Kevin Brott wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 13:59 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >
> > `Complex' in `_Complex_I' can't possibly be macro-expanded. There must
> > be something else.
>
> Could line 52 be expanded/dereferenced by cpp to make _Complex_I resolve
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Great, thank you Neil! (It'd have taken time before I could think of
> such a thing...)
Thanks, I was lucky there. Do you think it's worth adding something
to CVS to try to make sure that we don't accidentally use func_data
again in future?
What I
