Re: Anyone relying on "break-at" breakpoints?

2007-10-28 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are (at least) three possibly interesting requirements that this > doesn't cover. Right now I'm still wondering about these, so ideas > are welcome. > > 1. The Guile application is going to load a file that contains >directly-executed code

Re: Anyone relying on "break-at" breakpoints?

2007-10-28 Thread Neil Jerram
[I'm sorry about this email, masquerading as being from me, but actually one that Ludovic wrote yesterday. For some reason I didn't receive Ludovic's email through email, but just noticed it in the web archive. So I was trying to reconstruct Ludovic's email in Gnus so that I could reply to it - a

Re: Anyone relying on "break-at" breakpoints?

2007-10-28 Thread Neil Jerram
Ludovic wrote: > Hi, > > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> There are (at least) three possibly interesting requirements that this >> doesn't cover. Right now I'm still wondering about these, so ideas >> are welcome. >> >> 1. The Guile application is going to load a file that contains >