Re: Guile Introspection

"Mike Gran" wrote: >what is the scheme version of the following C code > >printf("%s %d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__); A better solution[1] than the other I posted. Still far from perfect. [1] -- Marco Maggi "They say jump!, you say how

Re: current module fluid

Hi Jon, Jon Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the swift reply. However, I meant to ask whether or not > the fluid "the_module" is accessible from scheme as a fluid. Ah sorry. Then the answer is "no". Then indeed, you have to go through `dynamic-wind'. Arguably, this is not very

Re: current module fluid

Hi Ludovic, Thanks for the suggestion. I likely never would have found save-module-excursion on my own. Ludovic Courtès wrote: And no, it's not documented (patch welcome! ;-)). Here we are: (attached) Regards, Jon Index: api-modules.texi =

Re: undocumented bound symbols

Hi, Jon Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the interest of getting things started, I took care of one of the > easy ones. I checked out the latest from CVS HEAD, and added both > "1+" and "1-" to the manual there. I committed something similar, thanks! Note that most of the other undocume

Re: undocumented bound symbols

Hi Ludovic, Thanks for committing my patch. Ludovic Courtès wrote: Note that most of the other undocumented symbols you listed are either from RnRS or some SRFI. It has been just long enough now that I don't remember exactly what I did. I do recall that I took all r5rs symbols (that were li