Re: any news on 1.8 and slib?

2006-11-22 Thread Rob Browning
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> With respect to SLIB, as mentioned, I was talking to Aubrey Jaffer, >> and at the time it sounded like we might want to follow a different >> approach in 1.8, one where each SLIB feature would have its own Guile >> module with its own exports. I didn't g

guile and XML (mixp)

2006-11-22 Thread Paul Emsley
Anyone using mixp and can help out here? $ [configure/make/make install all clean] $ cd test $ guile-expat test-mixp.scm /xxx/guile/1.6/ice-9/syncase.scm:130:16: In procedure scm-error in expression (scm-error (quote misc-error) who ...): /xxx/share/guile/1.6/ice-9/syncase.scm:130:16: invalid s

Re: Creating Modules within C

2006-11-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Volkan YAZICI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On Nov 17 12:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> You could write a piece of Scheme to create the relevant module. >> Namely, you could start with something like this: >> >> (let ((m (make-module))) >> (module-use-interfaces! m >>

Re: guile and XML (mixp)

2006-11-22 Thread Neil Jerram
Paul Emsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone using mixp and can help out here? > > > $ [configure/make/make install all clean] > $ cd test > $ guile-expat test-mixp.scm > /xxx/guile/1.6/ice-9/syncase.scm:130:16: In procedure scm-error in expression > (scm-error (quote misc-error) who ...): >

Re: guile and XML (mixp)

2006-11-22 Thread dsmich
Paul Emsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone using mixp and can help out here? > > > $ [configure/make/make install all clean] > $ cd test > $ guile-expat test-mixp.scm > /xxx/guile/1.6/ice-9/syncase.scm:130:16: In procedure scm-error in expression > (scm-error (quote misc-error) who

Re: Creating Modules within C

2006-11-22 Thread Volkan YAZICI
Hi, On Nov 22 06:43, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > A "module" object is (roughly) little more than a hash table (where > symbols of global variables are looked up) and a list of modules > depended on. > > `make-module' is the constructor of module objects: it creates, a new, > empty module, with no de