Re: find s-expr in the REPL?

Daniel Llorens del Río <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I'd like to have the following key bindings in the REPL: > > - like up-arrow, but shows previous s-expr instead of last line Just to check what you mean here: in many cases a line is a single sexp, so there is no difference - so I presu

[ANN] New greg versions

Hi all, new major version of greg is release :) -- The simplicity of the Greg framework makes it easy to write tests for any program, but it was specifically written for use with GNUstep-Guile to permit direct testing of the http://www.gnustep.org/ libraries without the necessity to run a sepa

Re: find s-expr in the REPL?

On 25 Sep, 2006, at 18:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to check what you mean here: in many cases a line is a single sexp, so there is no difference - so I presume you're talking about the case where a sexp is split across lines, e.g. guile> (define (foo) guile> (bar)) and saying that whe