Hi,
> > So i assume you'll be taking care of this?
>
> What would be "this", exactly? :-)
Porting of guile to maemo/770 and making debian packages for it.
> I am not going to write Guile/Hildong bindings myself in the
> foreseeable future.
OK! i think i'll try to do this part.
--
Re
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You can
>> look at it in my GNU Arch archive if that is of interest to you:
>>
>> $ tla register-archive http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/arch-2004/
>
> Hmm. I'll have to make another attempt to understand Arch, then; I'm
> afraid it co
Zeeshan Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Were you building 1.6, or 1.7/CVS?
>
>IIRC, it was 1.7. I really need to do it again to be sure on what
>happend.
That's interesting, I tried to build CVS and hit a problem running
./configure:
checking for lt_dlinit in -lltdl... no
conf
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my other life, I am working for Nokia on the 770 and at some point
> I of course compiled Guile for it. It was a no-brainer as far as I
> remember.
Not for me unfortunately ... but I've written about that in another
post.
> In fact, I would be the
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:13:40 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> You can
> >> look at it in my GNU Arch archive if that is of interest to you:
> >>
> >> $ tla register-archive http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/arch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> `get' is quite interesting too, once you're done with
> `register-archive'. ;-)
>
> $ tla get [EMAIL PROTECTED]/guile-vm--revival--0.6 guile-vm
>
> ^^^
> |
David Pirotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> $ tla get [EMAIL PROTECTED]/guile-vm--revival--0.6 guile-vm
>>
>> ^^^
>> |||
>> name of the archive
Warum gelingt eigentlich die Uebersetzung von guile unter MinGW nicht ?
Gruss
nobis
___
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
Julian Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/31/05, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm afraid that doesn't help me much ... unless there are JDOM
>> applications that I could refer to as examples?
>
> I think this is turning into a defense of the DOM spec itself, which I
> think wo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Sure, and it's called `update'. :-) To summarize:
>
> # Teach tla that some archive (or ``repository'') is available at URI.
> $ tla register-archive URI
>
> # At this point, it knows that an archive named
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED]' is available
10 matches
Mail list logo
