guile-core.unstable-20050414

trying to configure guile-core.unstable-20050414 ./configure --with-threads --with-readline ... checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... no configure: error: GNU MP not found, see README but the following package is installed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ 3 $ dpkg -l |

i18n

hello, is there somewhere a i18n module for guile 1.6.7 ? david ___ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user

xgettext -L Scheme

Hello, [I am new to gettext and xgettext usage] following packages installed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ 5 $ dpkg -l | grep gettext ii gettext0.14.3-1 GNU Internationalization utilities ii gettext-base 0.14.3-1 GNU Internationalization utilities for the b ii gettext-doc

Re: guile-core.unstable-20050414

David Pirotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ 3 $ dpkg -l | grep gmp > ii libgmp34.1.4-6Multiprecision arithmetic library You also need libgmp3-dev. This is true in general on Debian: in order to compile against some libfoo library, you usually

Re: guile-core.unstable-20050414

David Pirotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > trying to configure guile-core.unstable-20050414 > > ./configure --with-threads --with-readline > ... > checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... no > configure: error: GNU MP not found, see README > > but the following package is inst

inexact->exact in 1.7.1

this behavior of inexact->exact in guile 1.7.1 causes my program to become confused: guile> (inexact->exact 48.0) 48 guile> (inexact->exact (* .1 480.0)) 48 guile> (inexact->exact (* (- 1.1 1) 480.0)) 3377699720527875/70368744177664 guile>(quit) $ uname -a Darwin pinhead.music.uiuc.edu 7.8.0 Darw

Re: inexact->exact in 1.7.1

Rick Taube wrote: this behavior of inexact->exact in guile 1.7.1 causes my program to become confused: I suspect you're the one who is confused. You need to learn about floating-point arithmetic. (- 1.1 1) does not necessarily give the same result as 0.1. i attempted to see if guile 1.7.2 fixes th

Re: inexact->exact in 1.7.1

Rick Taube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this behavior of inexact->exact in guile 1.7.1 causes my program to > become confused: > > guile> (inexact->exact 48.0) > 48 > guile> (inexact->exact (* .1 480.0)) > 48 > guile> (inexact->exact (* (- 1.1 1) 480.0)) > 3377699720527875/70368744177664 This ha

Re: inexact->exact in 1.7.1

Thank you, i was porting my code from 1.6.7 to the new version where it broke and I forgot about this. time for a m-x tags-search! --rick This happens because Guile now has exact rationals. This NEWS entry explains the behavior: ** inexact->exact no longer returns only integers. Without

Using a macro with FOLD alters FOLD procedure!

I've noticed some strange behavior from (srfi-1) "fold" using a macro as the KONS argument. I've attached a file that exhibits the problem. In a nutshell, using a macro as the KONS argument for FOLD results in the procedure source for FOLD being altered. I was wondering, is this "expected behavi

Re: Using a macro with FOLD alters FOLD procedure!

On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 11:38 -0700, Steve Juranich wrote: > I was wondering, is this "expected behavior", or have I uncovered > something? If this is expected behavior, I'd suggest that FOLD should > do a check to make sure that the KONS argument is not a macro. If > I've uncovered a bug, I'll fil

Re: Using a macro with FOLD alters FOLD procedure!

On 4/15/05, Stephen Compall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > `fold' in SRFI-1 mentions that KONS is supposed to be a function. > > If you give a macro to fold, the macro gets expanded and memoized as > such, when the macro is called normally, as it is as an optimization in > the common case of one lis

Re: xgettext -L Scheme

David Pirotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > am I missunderstanding something here? I had to add "--keyword=_" to xgettext when using _ as an alias for gettext. Dunno if that's meant to be builtin. ___ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http: