Re: using a module : rename a single definition

2024-03-27 Thread Damien Mattei
thank you for the advice,for now i'm trying with Racket r6rs support and it is not easy, the solution in guile seems to be to rename or to use the define-module style instead of the r6rs library, if only a name in the new library is the same as an existing name in guile library it is not usable as

Re: using a module : rename a single definition

2024-03-27 Thread Hans-Werner Roitzsch
Hello Damien, Be aware though, that porting some exports may not work without renaming them: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2023-06/msg00020.html Regards, Zelphir On 3/27/24 08:42, Damien Mattei wrote: yes it should works. I trying to port all my scheme code in R6RS library sty

Re: using a module : rename a single definition

2024-03-27 Thread Damien Mattei
yes it should works. I trying to port all my scheme code in R6RS library style for compatibility,it's a bit complex depending the integration of R6RS in a particular scheme but i think there should be a compatibility advantage doing that. Damien On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:09 AM Maxime Devos wrot

RE: using a module : rename a single definition

2024-03-19 Thread Maxime Devos
Yes, with ‘library’ or ‘define-library’ forms. (see https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R6RS-Libraries.html) (library (insert name here) (export [insert exports here]) (import (guile) ; standard imports (rename (ice-9 popen) (open-pipe pipe-open))) [insert definitio

Re: using a module : rename a single definition

2024-03-03 Thread Damien Mattei
yes , your solution works, thanks : (use-modules (Scheme+) (matrix+) (srfi srfi-42) ; import all definitions ((srfi srfi-42) #:select ((: . s42-:))) ; rename only one ;;((srfi srfi-42) ; Eager Comprehensions ;; #:prefix s42-) (oop goops) (srfi srfi-43)) ; ve

Re: using a module : rename a single definition

2024-03-03 Thread tomas
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:46:41AM +0100, Damien Mattei wrote: > hello, > > is it possible to import a module having just one variable renamed (not > all) , as in Racket: > > (require (rename-in srfi/42 > (: s42:))) ; Eager Comprehensions > > it seems in Guile either all is imported

Re: using a module : rename a single definition

2024-03-03 Thread Tomas Volf
On 2024-03-03 09:46:41 +0100, Damien Mattei wrote: > hello, > > is it possible to import a module having just one variable renamed (not > all) , as in Racket: > > (require (rename-in srfi/42 > (: s42:))) ; Eager Comprehensions > > it seems in Guile either all is imported and prefixed o

using a module : rename a single definition

2024-03-03 Thread Damien Mattei
hello, is it possible to import a module having just one variable renamed (not all) , as in Racket: (require (rename-in srfi/42 (: s42:))) ; Eager Comprehensions it seems in Guile either all is imported and prefixed or only a selection of bindings can be imported: https://www.gnu.o