Re: release_1-9-12

2010-09-10 Thread Andy Wingo
Greets, On Thu 09 Sep 2010 11:45, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > ri...@happyleptic.org writes: > >> I tested it on the various hardware around and the only problem I >> encountered was that on a busybox/ARM some Makefiles are relying on gnu >> touch (using options -r and -t) which was n

Re: release_1-9-12

2010-09-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! ri...@happyleptic.org writes: > I tested it on the various hardware around and the only problem I > encountered was that on a busybox/ARM some Makefiles are relying on gnu > touch (using options -r and -t) which was not available under the name > "touch" but gtouch (installed separately from

release_1-9-12

2010-09-08 Thread rixed
I tested it on the various hardware around and the only problem I encountered was that on a busybox/ARM some Makefiles are relying on gnu touch (using options -r and -t) which was not available under the name "touch" but gtouch (installed separately from busybox). This could have been simplier with