Marius Vollmer wrote:
I agree that this is not really wanted. So I vote for removing the
last line of the code snippet above. The (guile) module is used
anyway in every module. Ok?
OK with me.
Neil
___
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user
Rick Taube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Im having a problem getting the srfi-1 definition of list-index (which
> is defined in both guile and srfi-1) to stay in effect when I load my
> system from the command line using the -l option. im not sure what is
> going wrong.
That is actually a 'featu
Rick-
Tried it out. I agree that it doesn't work, just as you described.
I was able to verify that the problem isn't in the order that things
are being defined. The normal "list-index" gets defined first and then
the srfi-1 "list-index" gets defined later.
Once the guile prompt comes up, "li
On 4/16/05, Rick Taube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im having a problem getting the srfi-1 definition of list-index (which
> is defined in both guile and srfi-1) to stay in effect when I load my
> system from the command line using the -l option. im not sure what is
> going wrong.
This is kind of
Im having a problem getting the srfi-1 definition of list-index (which
is defined in both guile and srfi-1) to stay in effect when I load my
system from the command line using the -l option. im not sure what is
going wrong.
I load my program by loading a file called cm.scm, which in turn loads
