hi there!
I'm glad that you're interested on Guile's multi-lang feature.
Guile has several languages front-end now, but some of them are
half-baked. I'm one of the fans of multi-lang, but I think I have to
wait for Guile's brand new registerVM, or the work based on current
stackVM maybe just wastin
I'm curious, what is the current status of support for other interpreted
languages in the Guile VM? For example, what's the status of Python for
Guile? As probably many of you , once I've felt the power of lispy
languages, it's an annoyance to go back to anything inferior, but many
people I work wi
Doug Evans skribis:
> Doug Evans writes:
>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Doug Evans skribis:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> As discussed on IRC, one possible issue is eq?-ness of SMOBs: one would
> usually expects pointer e
Doug Evans skribis:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Doug Evans skribis:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
As discussed on IRC, one possible issue is eq?-ness of SMOBs: one would
usually expects pointer equality t
Doug Evans writes:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Doug Evans skribis:
>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
As discussed on IRC, one possible issue is eq?-ness of SMOBs: one would
usually expects pointer equality to be preserved at th
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Doug Evans skribis:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> As discussed on IRC, one possible issue is eq?-ness of SMOBs: one would
>>> usually expects pointer equality to be preserved at the Scheme lev
Doug Evans skribis:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> As discussed on IRC, one possible issue is eq?-ness of SMOBs: one would
>> usually expects pointer equality to be preserved at the Scheme level.
>
> Yeah.
> That'll require gdb maintaining its own table(s) fo
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Doug Evans wrote:
>> As discussed on IRC, one possible issue is eq?-ness of SMOBs: one would
>> usually expects pointer equality to be preserved at the Scheme level.
>
> Yeah.
> That'll require gdb maintaining its own table(s) for each kind of smob
> we want to int
() Doug Evans
() Sat, 9 Nov 2013 10:40:18 -0800
Would it be ok to punt on eq?-ness until there's a compelling reason
to make it work?
Does the non-‘eq?’-ness of smobs prevent them from retaining object
properties, here? This is the long-standing bug that GNU Serveez is
addressing (in the
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Doug Evans skribis:
>
>> fyi, I've uploaded my gdb-guile branch to github.
>>
>> https://github.com/dje42/gdb.git
>>
>> It's in branch gdb-guile.
>
> Nice piece of work from several angles (implementation strategy, test
> coverag
Hello,
Doug Evans skribis:
> fyi, I've uploaded my gdb-guile branch to github.
>
> https://github.com/dje42/gdb.git
>
> It's in branch gdb-guile.
Nice piece of work from several angles (implementation strategy, test
coverage, style, docstrings, comments, etc.)
> It's still very preliminary, th
Hi.
fyi, I've uploaded my gdb-guile branch to github.
https://github.com/dje42/gdb.git
It's in branch gdb-guile.
It's still very preliminary, there's still lots to do, and there are
some open issues.
If you're interested take a look.
We'll have to see how things end up if/after it passes code re
Hi.
fyi, I've uploaded my gdb-guile branch to github.
https://github.com/dje42/gdb.git
It's in branch gdb-guile.
It's still very preliminary, and there are some open issues.
If you're interested take a look.
We'll have to see how things end up if/after it passes code review, so
while I welcome a
13 matches
Mail list logo
