Quoth "Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/23 Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Are you planning to release a 1.8-compatible guile-pg pkgsrc package
>> anytime soon?
>
> FWIW, I'm going to have a go at this (1.8-compatible guile-pg). I'll
> be doing it as an in-between kind of t
2008/10/23 Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Are you planning to release a 1.8-compatible guile-pg pkgsrc package
> anytime soon?
FWIW, I'm going to have a go at this (1.8-compatible guile-pg). I'll
be doing it as an in-between kind of task, though, so please don't
hold your breath!
(I
Quoth Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> I think you are referring to guile-pg 0.07
>>
>> I'm referring to whichever guile-pg you get when you issue the command
>> 'apt-get install guile-pg' on a stock Debian box.
>
> Sorry, but that means you don't know Which version it is.
Indeed it does. Bu
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
than select the package name and release [stable, testing, unstable]
you get this page:
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/guile-pg
Thanks. That page is missing links to the upstream homepage and
distfile. But I grabbed the
Le Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:40:11 -0400,
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> ...
> I do not have any idea about Debian packages. I would say that if
> Debian is tracking 0.07 they are behind and probably should switch - it
> has been 8 years. But I don't know if the 0.07 version works with 1.
Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes, this needs to be done, but there is quite a bit more work that
>> has to happen.
>>
>> The C code uses features and interfaces from Guile 1.4 that are
>> deprecated in 1.6 and completely removed in 1.8. You just can't
>> compile and link the
Quoth Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's less work to write the wrapper to ttn's version.
Quoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> (define-module (pg whatever)
>> #:export (guile-pg symbols ...))
>>
>> (load-extension "libwhateverpg" "guile
Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (define-module (pg whatever)
> #:export (guile-pg symbols ...))
>
> (load-extension "libwhateverpg" "guile_pg_init")
>
> Is roughly what you need. Assuming that there is an init function in
> guile-pg that creates all of bindings for th
Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoth Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> but...
>>
>> "To build Guile-PG you need to have installed both the PostgreSQL
>>frontend library libpq, and a version of Guile that can load binary
>>module (a b c) from file a/b/c.so or a/b/c/li
> True, but to make this work in 1.8 you just have to write a single .scm
> file for the module which loads the shlib and re-exports all the right
> symbols. And maybe a little else, but I am pretty sure not much.
Easy for a C programmer no doubt, but not so easy for a lowly scripter
l
Quoth Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> but...
>
> "To build Guile-PG you need to have installed both the PostgreSQL
>frontend library libpq, and a version of Guile that can load binary
>module (a b c) from file a/b/c.so or a/b/c/libc.la under `%load-path'."
>
> I believe the last bi
but...
"To build Guile-PG you need to have installed both the PostgreSQL
frontend library libpq, and a version of Guile that can load binary
module (a b c) from file a/b/c.so or a/b/c/libc.la under `%load-path'."
I believe the last bit means it'll work with guile-1.4 or guile-1.6
Quoth "Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/16 Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> guile-pg is definitely more feature-full in that case. and ttn's
>> guile-1.4 compatible guile-pg is much more fetaure-full than the
>> guile-1.6 compatible guile-pg generally available through distr
2008/10/16 Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> guile-pg is definitely more feature-full in that case. and ttn's
> guile-1.4 compatible guile-pg is much more fetaure-full than the
> guile-1.6 compatible guile-pg generally available through distros.
What does it do? What are the features? I'v
Quoth "Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/15 Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Quoth "Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Dunno. However, fyi, I'm maintaining guile-dbi, which wraps
>>> postgres and mysql.
>>
>> Do you happen to know how guile-dbi's postgres wrapping compare
2008/10/15 Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoth "Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Dunno. However, fyi, I'm maintaining guile-dbi, which wraps
>> postgres and mysql.
>
> Do you happen to know how guile-dbi's postgres wrapping compare with
> guile-pg, feature-wise?
Dunno. guile-dbi p
2008/10/14 betoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
> 2008/10/14 betoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> In the Debian distro, there is a packge named guile-db, which refers to a
>> Berkeley DB wr
Quoth "Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/14 betoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> In the Debian distro, there is a packge named guile-db, which refers to a
>> Berkeley DB wrap for Guile. Do someone know if it is active? If
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> 2008/10/14 betoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > In the Debian distro, there is a packge named guile-db, which refers to a
> > Berkeley DB wrap for Guile. Do someone know if it is active? If
2008/10/14 betoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello list,
>
> In the Debian distro, there is a packge named guile-db, which refers to a
> Berkeley DB wrap for Guile. Do someone know if it is active? If there is a
> repository or web page? I tried the maintainer and author e-ma
Hello list,
In the Debian distro, there is a packge named guile-db, which refers to
a Berkeley DB wrap for Guile. Do someone know if it is active? If there
is a repository or web page? I tried the maintainer and author e-mails
with no success.
Regards
Betoes
21 matches
Mail list logo
