Hello,
> ...
> OK, I've found out by using "apt-cache policy package-name": I need to
> lower the default priorities of packages from testing other than guile
> with
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release o=Debian
> Pin-Priority: 10
good to know, tx!
> Now I do not get other packages with "aptitude full
Chris Vine writes:
> But quite honestly, if you want to experiment with newer software don't
> use an archaic distribution such as debian stable, which is out of date
> even when first released.
Umm, I think it's quite reasonable to run a distribution of older
software that has gone through a lon
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Federico Beffa wrote:
> David Pirotte writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> As far as I inderstand the Debian package manager mantains a package
>>> database. This is the place where it looks for installed packages. So,
>>> if I have a newer version of guile which is not ins
David Pirotte writes:
> Hello,
>
>> As far as I inderstand the Debian package manager mantains a package
>> database. This is the place where it looks for installed packages. So,
>> if I have a newer version of guile which is not installed through the
>> package manager, the package manager will
Hello,
> As far as I inderstand the Debian package manager mantains a package
> database. This is the place where it looks for installed packages. So,
> if I have a newer version of guile which is not installed through the
> package manager, the package manager will not know about it.
even if you
Chris Vine writes:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:46:07 +0200
> Federico Beffa wrote:
> [snip]
>> Your guess is correct: The distribution that I'm using (Debian wheezy)
>> ships 2.0.5 as the newest guile version and I need to keep it to
>> satisfy dependencies of other distribution supplied packages.
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:46:07 +0200
Federico Beffa wrote:
[snip]
> Your guess is correct: The distribution that I'm using (Debian wheezy)
> ships 2.0.5 as the newest guile version and I need to keep it to
> satisfy dependencies of other distribution supplied packages.
> However, I would like to exp
Neil Jerram writes:
> On 2014-09-15 02:16, m...@netris.org wrote:
>> Federico Beffa writes:
>>
>>> I notice that there is an /etc/ld.so.cache file. Do I somehow need
>>> to update
>>> it?
>>
>> Yes, you update it by running "ldconfig" as root. This needs to be
>> done
>> when installing librari
Chris Vine writes:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:16:39 -0400
> m...@netris.org wrote:
>> Federico Beffa writes:
>>
>> > Neil Jerram writes:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> This is just a guess, but what happens if you do this:
>> >>
>> >> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib /usr/local/bin/guile
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:22:27 +0200
Federico Beffa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Neil Jerram
[snip]
> > However, won't it also cause /usr/bin/guile (2.0.5) to load
> > /usr/local/lib/libguile* (2.0.11) ? If not, what is the mechanism
> > that tells /usr/bin/guile (2.0.5) to load /usr/
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:16:39 -0400
m...@netris.org wrote:
> Federico Beffa writes:
>
> > Neil Jerram writes:
> >
> >>
> >> This is just a guess, but what happens if you do this:
> >>
> >> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib /usr/local/bin/guile
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Neil
> >
> > With this it
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Neil Jerram wrote:
> On 2014-09-15 02:16, m...@netris.org wrote:
>>
>> Federico Beffa writes:
>>
>>> Neil Jerram writes:
>>>
This is just a guess, but what happens if you do this:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib /usr/local/bin/guile
>>>
On 2014-09-15 02:16, m...@netris.org wrote:
Federico Beffa writes:
Neil Jerram writes:
This is just a guess, but what happens if you do this:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib /usr/local/bin/guile
Regards,
Neil
With this it works!
I notice that there is an /etc/ld.so.cache file. D
Federico Beffa skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> It may be that, while /usr/local/bin/guile is indeed from the new
>> version, it ends up loading .scm and .go files from the old version.
>>
>> You could check that by running:
>>
>> strace -o log /usr/local/bin/guile --versi
Federico Beffa writes:
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
>>
>> This is just a guess, but what happens if you do this:
>>
>> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib /usr/local/bin/guile
>>
>> Regards,
>> Neil
>
> With this it works!
>
> I notice that there is an /etc/ld.so.cache file. Do I somehow need to up
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:42:58 +0200
Federico Beffa wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > It may be that, while /usr/local/bin/guile is indeed from the new
> > version, it ends up loading .scm and .go files from the old version.
> >
> > You could check that by running:
> >
> > str
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> It may be that, while /usr/local/bin/guile is indeed from the new
> version, it ends up loading .scm and .go files from the old version.
>
> You could check that by running:
>
> strace -o log /usr/local/bin/guile --version
>
> and grepping for .scm and .g
Neil Jerram writes:
>
> This is just a guess, but what happens if you do this:
>
> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib /usr/local/bin/guile
>
> Regards,
> Neil
With this it works!
I notice that there is an /etc/ld.so.cache file. Do I somehow need to update
it?
Thanks,
Fede
Federico Beffa skribis:
> Everything appeared to be fine. However, with my surprise, when I
> started the newly installed guile with
>
> $ /usr/local/bin/guile
>
> I was greeted with
>
> GNU Guile 2.0.5-deb+1-3
> Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> ...
It may be that, while
Federico Beffa writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm on Debian 7.6 with guile-2.0.5 installed. I would like to install
> a newer version of guile. Therefore I downloaded 2.0.11 and installed
> in /usr/local with
>
> ./configure
> make
> sudo make install
>
> Everything appeared to be fine. However, with my surpr
> Hi Federico,
> That is odd, on my Debian "wheezy" system, the debian packaged guile
> is a symbolic link /usr/bin/guile to
> /etc/alternatives/guile, which in turn is a symbolic link to
> /usr/bin/guile-2.0 . What returns from the command "which guile" on
> your system ?
With the locally install
Hi Federico,
That is odd, on my Debian "wheezy" system, the debian packaged guile is a
symbolic link /usr/bin/guile to
/etc/alternatives/guile, which in turn is a symbolic link to
/usr/bin/guile-2.0 . What returns from the command "which guile" on your
system ?
The method I have tended to use, whi
Hi,
I'm on Debian 7.6 with guile-2.0.5 installed. I would like to install
a newer version of guile. Therefore I downloaded 2.0.11 and installed
in /usr/local with
./configure
make
sudo make install
Everything appeared to be fine. However, with my surprise, when I
started the newly installed guil
23 matches
Mail list logo
