Hi Peter,
Sorry for the terrible delay here.
On Sat 04 Jun 2011 02:26, Peter TB Brett writes:
> I just finished porting gEDA (http://www.gpleda.org/) to Guile 2.0!
Yay!
> In Guile 1.8.x, scm_display_error() takes a stack as the first
> argument. In Guile 2.0.x, scm_display_error() takes a fr
Peter TB Brett writes:
> Can anyone suggest a sensible way to support both? I haven't been able
> to figure out a good feature test... at the moment I've had to resort to
> passing #f. :-(
How about executing a fragment of Guile code that calls display-error,
and seeing if it throws an exception
> Hi folks,
>
> I just finished porting gEDA (http://www.gpleda.org/) to Guile 2.0!
>
> I encountered one problem, though.
>
> In Guile 1.8.x, scm_display_error() takes a stack as the first
> argument. In Guile 2.0.x, scm_display_error() takes a frame as the
> first argument.
>
> Can anyone su
Hi folks,
I just finished porting gEDA (http://www.gpleda.org/) to Guile 2.0!
I encountered one problem, though.
In Guile 1.8.x, scm_display_error() takes a stack as the first
argument. In Guile 2.0.x, scm_display_error() takes a frame as the
first argument.
Can anyone suggest a sensible way t
