On Tue, February 16, 2010 16:20, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> what does ldd libguile-mytest.so show? Are all dependencies resolved?
I think so.
> If you compile the following, will it run? [...]
> i.e. is this enough to compile it: [...]
Mercury needs to be initialized, and the C compiler needs to kn
On 15 February 2010 11:43, Tomas By wrote:
> Hello again everybody,
Just a wild guess -- i'm focusing on the "file not found" aspect of the
error message:
what does ldd libguile-mytest.so show? Are all dependencies resolved?
If you compile the following, will it run?
#include "mylibrary.h"
#i
Hello again everybody,
After some experimentation, it now seems clear that this has nothing
to do with garbage collection or Mercury. It is probably just a silly
programming error on my part.
Here follows full source code for a simple example that illustrates
the problem I am having. The importan
On Mon, February 8, 2010 13:50, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Looking at the strace(1) output you sent doesnât really help. Could you
> instead send the strace(1) output starting at the first occurrence of
> âlibguileâ?
It should be this bit I think:
open("/usr/lib/libguile.so.17", O_RDONLY) =
Hi,
"Tomas By" writes:
> The version of Guile I am using is 1.8.7 -- is it worth trying 1.9
> instead?
>
> Is it generally possible to use two different libgc at the same time?
Guile 1.8 does *not* use libgc. So there must be something else going on.
Looking at the strace(1) output you sent d
On Mon, February 8, 2010 13:15, Tomas By wrote:
> I have now tried to link my Mercury library with the libgc that Guile
> uses instead of the Mercury one, and I asked about it on the Mercury
> mailing list, where I got this reply:
>
> "The version of libgc that Mercury uses contains Mercury specifi
Hello again,
I have now tried to link my Mercury library with the libgc that Guile
uses instead of the Mercury one, and I asked about it on the Mercury
mailing list, where I got this reply:
"The version of libgc that Mercury uses contains Mercury specific
modifications; I would be surprised if li
Hi,
"Tomas By" writes:
> open("/usr/local/mercury-rotd-2009-12-28/lib/mercury/lib/libgc.so",
> O_RDONLY) = 9
[...]
> I guess that "libgc.so" is the Mercury garbage collector. Is there some
> problem with having another GC in a Guile module?
The problem is that Guile 1.9 is linked against anot
Hi all,
I'm trying to create a Guile module, using code written in Mercury.
(http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/research/mercury/)
I have managed to produce a library file (.so), but when I try to open
it in Guile (with dynamic-link), I get "file not found". It's clear from
the strace output that it does find
