Re: calling.scm

2007-09-30 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Klaus Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't understand yet what the functions in calling.scm > are supposed to do, thus can't fix it, and the comments in > calling.scm are too vague, and the guilr-ref refuses > to document them. Given their name, I vag

calling.scm

2007-09-29 Thread Klaus Schilling
there are some absurditiies in ice9/calling.scm. e.g. in several places variable names are passed to gensym. If the variable names are symbols, you get a wrong-type error as gensym expexts strings as an argument. If the variable names are written as strings, you run into a bad-variable-name