The saga continues...
2008/11/20 Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/15 Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/11/12 Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Yes, of course, the problem remains.
>>
>> Explanation:
>>
>> Thread 1 is the first thread that does any Guile stuff, so it load
2008/11/15 Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/12 Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Yes, of course, the problem remains.
>
> Explanation:
>
> Thread 1 is the first thread that does any Guile stuff, so it loads
> boot-9.scm, which means that it ends up in the (guile-user) module.
>
> Th
2008/11/19 Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/15 Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Well, originally, my code loaded a smob interface
>> (defined a bunch of smobs) in thread 1, which I then
>> found to be undefined in thread 2 (and all subsequent
>> threads). Would your fix solve th
2008/11/15 Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Well, originally, my code loaded a smob interface
> (defined a bunch of smobs) in thread 1, which I then
> found to be undefined in thread 2 (and all subsequent
> threads). Would your fix solve this?
I guess yes if the problem was trying to refer
Hi Neil,
Thanks for the reply,
2008/11/15 Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/12 Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Yes, of course, the problem remains.
>
> Explanation:
>
> Thread 1 is the first thread that does any Guile stuff, so it loads
> boot-9.scm, which means that it ends up i
2008/11/12 Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, of course, the problem remains.
Explanation:
Thread 1 is the first thread that does any Guile stuff, so it loads
boot-9.scm, which means that it ends up in the (guile-user) module.
Thread 2 hasn't done any (set-current-module ...), so it stay
2008/11/12 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Linas,
>
> "Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> void * scm_one (void *p)
>> {
>> prtdbg("thread one");
>> scm_c_eval_string ("(define x \"asddf\")\n");
>> }
>>
>> void * scm_two (void *p)
>> {
>> prtdbg("thread two")
Hi Linas,
"Linas Vepstas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> void * scm_one (void *p)
> {
> prtdbg("thread one");
> scm_c_eval_string ("(define x \"asddf\")\n");
> }
>
> void * scm_two (void *p)
> {
> prtdbg("thread two");
> scm_c_eval_string ("(display x)\n");
> }
AFAICS, the
Hi,
I am finding that things defined in one thread are not always
visible in another. This seems to be due to some threads
having a different current-module than others. I think this is a bug.
The example code below shows the issue. Help, comments
appreciated.
--linas
/**
* Guile threading b
