yes , and the solution i found is to pass the object to the method as
argument,
then assigning slot to local variables with accessors in the method and the
source code from Racket or Kawa. Original code was from Python and i had a
bit the same problem, not that slot are not accessible from method,
(Sorry, when writing "macro systems", I meant "object orientation systems".)
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:31 AM Mikael Djurfeldt
wrote:
> OK, now I see what you are asking. You want the slots to be available as
> local variables in the lexical scope of the method. The answer is that that
> is not
OK, now I see what you are asking. You want the slots to be available as
local variables in the lexical scope of the method. The answer is that that
is not possible "out of the box". I guess it *could* be made available
through some contortionist coding using a combination of GOOPS and the
syntax-c
just forget to say that in my previous examples, <- is a macro that
contain a set! case that is used with single variable.(does not use
setter, just set!)
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:19 AM Damien Mattei wrote:
>
> that is interesting answer about guile's features i did not know ,
> it is related wi
that is interesting answer about guile's features i did not know ,
it is related with code i'm writing that instead of fetching the value
modify it using the fetch syntax in Scheme+ but my question was just
about how to have a class method in a class that can set! the value of
a slot. This does nt
Well, if you want to set a slot explicitly using the set! form, and this is
a good way to access a slot, you can use an accessor (which internally is a
pair of a getter and a setter):
(define-class a () (x #:accessor x))
(define o (make a))
(set! (x o) 1)
(x o) -> 1
I guess you already know tha
hi,
is there a way to access a slot of a class like other variable with set! ,
Racket,Kawa allow that, but it does not seem to be the case in Guile.
regards,
damien
