"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAICT you have to write a C constructor:
And as well as a C desctructor?
Ooh, i thought SWIG can take care of all details for me. Apparently it
doesn't.
Thanks for your help.
--
William
We are MicroSoft. You will be assimilated. Resistance is f
"William Xu" wrote:
> Yes, it's more like a smob type pointer. Consider this,
>
>void bar(unsigned char *s)
>{
> printf("s = %s\n", s);
>}
>
> One problem is that how i create and pass a `unsigned
> char*' parameter to `bar'. If SWIG requires me to write
> smob creation myself,
"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "William Xu" wrote:
>> Swig could generate pointer types in C to smob. But users
>> still have to define smob related operations(like mark,
>> free, etc) by hand?
>
> Mh, no. I have never used SWIG but if I read [1] and [2]
> and by inspectin
"William Xu" wrote:
> Swig could generate pointer types in C to smob. But users
> still have to define smob related operations(like mark,
> free, etc) by hand?
Mh, no. I have never used SWIG but if I read [1] and [2]
and by inspecting "Examples/guile" in the source
distribution
Hi,
Swig could generate pointer types in C to smob. But users still have to
define smob related operations(like mark, free, etc) by hand?
--
William
It was a JOKE!! Get it?? I was receiving messages from DAVID LETTERMAN!!
YOW!!
___
Guile-user mai
