> Ah, and this is what you would need a separate cpp for?
It would certainly simplify the task of implementation
> Thanks for the pointer, I missed that. I have looked into that
> yesterday. There are 55 tests and Mes has two obvious reasons why none
> of them work: we need to supply some heade
>> Thanks for the pointers! I just released Mes 0.5, which is now fully
>> self hosting. We would need to investigate. However, if we restrict
>> the boostrapping path to either Mes or stage0+Mes, how could this help?
>
> The idea is to make a sub-C compiler that supports only enough of the C
>
> That could open up new possibilities. However, there are so many
> choices, is this going to help us get forward right now?
You are right, it might not be an ideal step
> Thanks for the pointers! I just released Mes 0.5, which is now fully
> self hosting. We would need to investigate. Howev
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 5:55 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
>
> [cc: Matt, author of Nyacc]
>
>> Well now you could have told them we already had the forth
>> https://github.com/oriansj/stage0/blob/master/stage2/forth.s
>> but none of the people in the forth community bothered to build upon it
>
[cc: Matt, author of Nyacc]
> Well now you could have told them we already had the forth
> https://github.com/oriansj/stage0/blob/master/stage2/forth.s
> but none of the people in the forth community bothered to build upon it
You created a fully bootstrappable LISP and FORTH, wow!
That would ma
> Aah, okay. That' smart. I got questions why I did not start with forth
> or brainfuck.
Well now you could have told them we already had the forth
https://github.com/oriansj/stage0/blob/master/stage2/forth.s
but none of the people in the forth community bothered to build upon it
> ...however,
Hi Jeremiah!
> I had recently watched your FOSDEM talk
> https://fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/guixsdbootstrap/
> Which you seem to have confused my hex assembler as an end in itself,
> rather than the first step in Stage0
Ah, that's why you say `You missed.' Sorry for giving that suggestion
March 28, 2017 5:09 PM
> To: Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB)
> Subject: Re: You missed my later work
>
> Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB) writes:
>
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for reaching out.
>
>> https://github.com/oriansj/stage0 [github.com]
>
>> It includes everything one ne