Amirouche Boubekki writes:
>> If both of those are correct, further possibilities would be:
>>
>> - Some or all of the structs in the C code are "packed".
>>
>> - There's a bug in bytestructures.
>>
>> To rule out these two, you can use a simple test case: write a tiny C
>> lib with a function th
Thanks for the reply.
On 2018-01-07 19:39, taylanbayi...@gmail.com wrote:
Amirouche Boubekki writes:
Here are some possibilities I can think of, wildly speculatively.
- %time-relative is defined wrong (I couldn't find the corresponding
GNUNET_TIME_Relative definition to compare)
Here is t
Amirouche Boubekki writes:
> I triple checked the %fs-progress-info definition, it's correct,
> but I still get incorrect value for status field, see download.scm
> line 13.
Wow, GNUNET_FS_ProgressInfo is hell of a struct. :-)
I also checked the bytestructure definition just in case but yes it
I am trying to rewrite the guile bindings for gnunet to
guile-bytestructures
and I face an issue for two days regarding `struct
GNUNET_FS_ProgressInfo`.
I attached to this mail the relevant files. In particular, download.scm
try to download a file over gnunet, if the file is in gnunet it should
