Re: Weird import behaviour of digital modules

2024-06-08 Thread lloda
> On 8 Jun 2024, at 19:30, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> wrote: > > On 2024-06-08 15:59:12 +0200, lloda wrote: >> Modules can't have numbers as names in general > > Modules most definitely *can* have numbers as names, my Advent of Code > solutions > are stored in files matching $YEAR/$DAY patter

Re: Weird import behaviour of digital modules

2024-06-08 Thread Tomas Volf
On 2024-06-08 15:59:12 +0200, lloda wrote: > Modules can't have numbers as names in general Modules most definitely *can* have numbers as names, my Advent of Code solutions are stored in files matching $YEAR/$DAY pattern (e.g. 2023/01.scm) and it works just fine, both define-module and use-modules

Re: Weird import behaviour of digital modules

2024-06-08 Thread lloda
> On 7 Jun 2024, at 21:51, Yuval Langer wrote: > > In this commit I have the WEIRDEST behaviour: > > https://codeberg.org/kakafarm/guile-srfi-189/commit/6e72cc50cc6b068de726f6e97b249a5af26d883c > > When I run the following command at the repository worktree root: > > ``` > guix shell -C gui

Weird import behaviour of digital modules

2024-06-07 Thread Yuval Langer
In this commit I have the WEIRDEST behaviour: https://codeberg.org/kakafarm/guile-srfi-189/commit/6e72cc50cc6b068de726f6e97b249a5af26d883c When I run the following command at the repository worktree root: ``` guix shell -C guile -- guile -L . test-guile.scm ``` all tests pass, but at line 24 of