Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-05-05 Thread Andy Wingo
On Thu 30 Apr 2009 23:09, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Andrew Gaylard writes: > >> I've seen that a build without optimisation, i.e.: > > That is expected: the evaluator and/or bytecode interpreter eat up too > much stack space with `-O0'. Actually I didn't expect that, after the rec

Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-30 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Andrew Gaylard writes: > After some digging, I'm a bit closer. Building from today's git > shows fewer problems: You're referring to `master', right? > grep '^==[0-9]*== [a-zA-Z]' ./hello-world.vg | > awk '/FILE DESCRIPTORS/ {x=0} x==1 {print} /My PID/ {x=1}' | > sort | uniq -c >

Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-30 Thread Andrew Gaylard
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Andrew Gaylard wrote: > Hi, > > I'm linking with libguile on Linux, built from source, to extend my > C application with Scheme. I'm seeing a lot of warnings from > valgrind.  The same warnings appear when using Guile standalone. > Should I be worried? After some d

Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-12 Thread Neil Jerram
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hello, > > Neil Jerram writes: > >> That is fundamentally true; however, we have recently addressed some >> genuine Valgrind warnings in the 1.8.x development branch. > > These were Helgrind warnings, not Memcheck warnings, right? Yes, good point! N

Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-08 Thread Paul Emsley
Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hello, Neil Jerram writes: That is fundamentally true; however, we have recently addressed some genuine Valgrind warnings in the 1.8.x development branch. These were Helgrind warnings, not Memcheck warnings, right? There's a suppression file there: http://

Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Neil Jerram writes: > That is fundamentally true; however, we have recently addressed some > genuine Valgrind warnings in the 1.8.x development branch. These were Helgrind warnings, not Memcheck warnings, right? There's a suppression file there: http://www.mail-archive.com/guile-de..

Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-07 Thread Andrew Gaylard
Hi, I'm linking with libguile on Linux, built from source, to extend my C application with Scheme. I'm seeing a lot of warnings from valgrind. The same warnings appear when using Guile standalone. Should I be worried? The following steps show the problem: Use this as hello-world.scm: #!/usr/lo

Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-07 Thread Neil Jerram
Andreas Rottmann writes: > Andrew Gaylard writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm linking with libguile on Linux, built from source, to extend my >> C application with Scheme. I'm seeing a lot of warnings from >> valgrind.  The same warnings appear when using Guile standalone. >> Should I be worried? >> > No

Re: Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-07 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Andrew Gaylard writes: > Hi, > > I'm linking with libguile on Linux, built from source, to extend my > C application with Scheme. I'm seeing a lot of warnings from > valgrind.  The same warnings appear when using Guile standalone. > Should I be worried? > No, this is normal AFAIK. The garbage col

Valgrind warnings with -1.8.6

2009-04-07 Thread Andrew Gaylard
Hi, I'm linking with libguile on Linux, built from source, to extend my C application with Scheme. I'm seeing a lot of warnings from valgrind.  The same warnings appear when using Guile standalone. Should I be worried? The following steps show the problem. Use this as hello-world.scm: #!/usr/lo