On 02/07/2015 20:07, David Kastrup wrote:
gnu.misc.discuss.
you just missed the list
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:48:42PM +0200, Michael Tiedtke wrote:
Found BSD in the sources. Thanks BSD:
3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
must display the following acknowledgement:
This product includes software develop
Michael Tiedtke writes:
> GNU for me was bit of fascinating self enforcing libertarian ideology
Whatever. This discussion group is about GUILE. If you want to tell
everybody about your discovery of the GNU project and your unique
insights regarding it, try gnu.misc.discuss instead.
--
David
On 02/07/2015 15:08, David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Tiedtke writes:
I just found a BSD copyright notice in inet_aton for the 1.8
branch. But then the GNU C library as well contains BSD code. We're
all going BSD, aren't we?
Try to catch up. Networking stack and utilities have been from BSDlite
Michael Tiedtke writes:
> I just found a BSD copyright notice in inet_aton for the 1.8
> branch. But then the GNU C library as well contains BSD code. We're
> all going BSD, aren't we?
Try to catch up. Networking stack and utilities have been from BSDlite
(?) in both Linux kernel and GNU from t
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:39:17PM +0200, Michael Tiedtke wrote:
It's really hard to tell whether this is a serious post or you are just
wasting other people's time/bandwith. But anyway:
> I just found a BSD copyright notice in inet_aton for the 1.8 branch.
So? Everyone can relicense code publi
I just found a BSD copyright notice in inet_aton for the 1.8 branch. But
then the GNU C library as well contains BSD code. We're all going BSD,
aren't we?
