gt;> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>> ~
>>
>> Are you suggesting, that I copy the code for SRFI 151 from
>> somewhere and put it into my project?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Zelphir
t; ~
>>
>> Are you suggesting, that I copy the code for SRFI 151 from somewhere and
>> put it into my project?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Zelphir
>> On 10/24/19 7:02 PM, John Cowan wrote:
>>
>> For bitwise integers, I recommend SRFI 151. If
Thanks for your input!
This also reads reasonable.
On 10/24/19 7:01 PM, Taylan Kammer wrote:
> On 24.10.2019 17:55, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
>> Hello Guile Users!
>>
>> I have a question regarding usage of SRFIs in Guile code.
>>
>> Sometimes there are core fu
gt; For bitwise integers, I recommend SRFI 151. If you use your
>> implementation to provide the seven core functions bitwise-not,
>> bitwise-and, bitwise-ior, bitwise-xor, arithmetic-shift,
>> integer-length, and bit-count, all of which have definitions in
>&g
twise integers, I recommend SRFI 151. If you use your
> implementation to provide the seven core functions bitwise-not,
> bitwise-and, bitwise-ior, bitwise-xor, arithmetic-shift, integer-length,
> and bit-count, all of which have definitions in bitwise-core.scm that are
> very slow, then you&
integer-length, and bit-count, all of which have definitions in
> bitwise-core.scm that are very slow, then you'll have a package that
> can do pretty much what all the bitwise SRFIs provide and more with
> acceptable performance.
>
> There is a conversion table at the end of the
27;ll have a
package that can do pretty much what all the bitwise SRFIs provide and more
with acceptable performance.
There is a conversion table at the end of the SRFI between the names used
by other SRFIs and the names used by SRFI 151; they are as close to SRFI 33
and SRFI 60 as practical. It is pa
On 24.10.2019 17:55, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
> Hello Guile Users!
>
> I have a question regarding usage of SRFIs in Guile code.
>
> Sometimes there are core functions, which are also available from an
> SRFI implementation. One example I am currently dealing with are bitwis
t the standard doesn't have.
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:56 PM Zelphir Kaltstahl
> mailto:zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de>> wrote:
>
> Hello Guile Users!
>
> I have a question regarding usage of SRFIs in Guile code.
>
> Sometimes there are core fu
; Hello Guile Users!
>
> I have a question regarding usage of SRFIs in Guile code.
>
> Sometimes there are core functions, which are also available from an
> SRFI implementation. One example I am currently dealing with are bitwise
> operations for integer numbers. There is SRFI 60 an
Hello Guile Users!
I have a question regarding usage of SRFIs in Guile code.
Sometimes there are core functions, which are also available from an
SRFI implementation. One example I am currently dealing with are bitwise
operations for integer numbers. There is SRFI 60 and there are the core
Christopher Howard writes:
> Hi, I was just wondering if Guile developers are planning to implement
> all the SRFIs eventually, or if they are just picking and choosing a
> few here and there? Put another way, is it just a matter of someone
> volunteering the time to do each SRFI,
Arne Babenhauserheide skribis:
> Christopher Howard writes:
>
>> Do the SRFIs typically require any C hacking? It seems in Guile there
>> is usually a C function for each built-in scheme function, but I'm not
>> sure how that applies to SRFIs.
>
> Most should
Christopher Howard writes:
> Do the SRFIs typically require any C hacking? It seems in Guile there
> is usually a C function for each built-in scheme function, but I'm not
> sure how that applies to SRFIs.
Most should not, but they do need good mapping to the performance
char
Do the SRFIs typically require any C hacking? It seems in Guile there
is usually a C function for each built-in scheme function, but I'm not
sure how that applies to SRFIs.
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 16:49 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Christopher,
>
> Christopher Howard skri
Hello Christopher,
Christopher Howard skribis:
> Hi, I was just wondering if Guile developers are planning to implement
> all the SRFIs eventually, or if they are just picking and choosing a
> few here and there? Put another way, is it just a matter of someone
> volunteering the tim
Le 17 sept. 2017 16:49, "Christopher Howard"
a écrit :
Hi, I was just wondering if Guile developers are planning to implement
all the SRFIs eventually, or if they are just picking and choosing a
few here and there? Put another way, is it just a matter of someone
volunteering the time
Hi, I was just wondering if Guile developers are planning to implement
all the SRFIs eventually, or if they are just picking and choosing a
few here and there? Put another way, is it just a matter of someone
volunteering the time to do each SRFI, or are some not being done on
purpose?
--
https
18 matches
Mail list logo
