I don't think we ever resolved this. It would be great if we could
get good support for Guile (and other Schemes). The way I like to
work (and this is standard in every well-managed Free Software project)
is I don't want to see your updated code; I want to see a patch
(created using 'diff -u' or
Hi, Ludo’;
A srfi-64-test.scm file is a test suite for the SRFI 64 and you can get it
from http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-64/srfi-64-test.scm .
51 expected passes and 2 expected failures are normal:
$ guile -L /home/sunjoong/guile/site --use-srfi=64 srfi-64-test.scm
Starting test SRFI 64 -
Hello,
Sunjoong Lee skribis:
> Your implementation fails srfi-64-test.scm, a test suite for the SRFI 64.
Oh, which ones? This is essentially the reference implementation, so it
shouldn’t fail. But perhaps my copy of srfi-64.scm is older than
srfi-64-test.scm?
> I don't know "Display a backtr
I've attached diff of 2007 testing.scm.
2012/4/21 Per Bothner
>
> I'm going to look at the patch in detail, but before I do, a question:
> Why is your srfi-64.scm.gz "for Guile, Chicken and Gambit" so very
> different from the reference implementation with your patch applied?
>
I just mean that
On 04/20/2012 03:19 AM, Sunjoong Lee wrote:
I'll attatch two files on this mail; srfi-64.scm.gz and testing.patch.gz.
The srfi-64.scm.gz file is for Guile, Chicken and Gambit users.
The testing.patch.gz file is for Per.
Much better. I applied your patch to the reference implementation,
and tha
Hi, Ludo’;
Your implementation fails srfi-64-test.scm, a test suite for the SRFI 64.
Per:
I realize the test-error of the reference implementation has a bug;
It calls %test-error like this - (test-assert (%test-error etype expr))
but %test-error needs three arguments - (%test-error r etype expr)
Hi,
Per Bothner skribis:
> I think it would be great to get SRFI-64 into Guile.
Me too.
FWIW, I’ve been using an almost-unmodified version in several projects:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libchop.git/tree/guile2/srfi
The only changes compared to the reference implementations are minor
Thanks Noah and Per;
English language is more difficult than scheme language for me. :(
I want to share my code or modification to others and learn somethings
during that.
Few days ago, I found testing.scm, the reference implementation of SRFI 64,
does not pass srfi-64-test.scm, a test suite for
On 04/19/2012 07:50 PM, Noah Lavine wrote:
Hello!
I'm a bit confused by this conversation. Do you want to merge this
code into Guile, or into the reference implementation of SRFI 64?
If it's into Guile, I can't speak for the maintainers, but I think we
would love to have it. We do like supporti
Hello!
I'm a bit confused by this conversation. Do you want to merge this
code into Guile, or into the reference implementation of SRFI 64?
If it's into Guile, I can't speak for the maintainers, but I think we
would love to have it. We do like supporting SRFIs.
Thanks,
Noah
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012
Now, srfi-64.scm works on Guile 1.8 and 2.0.
There are two different thins;
1) Guile 1.8 does not support nested block comments.
So, it does not pass srfi-64-test.scm test suite.
But, comments are comments - not problem.
2) srfi-64.scm on Guile 2.0 can catch and report the source for
This is nice. It would be great if the Guile port would be merged
into the reference implementation, presumably using cond-expand.
That way bug-fixes or changes in one could be more easily be
merged into the other.
The use of #:KEYWORD syntax might cause reader problems on some
Scheme implementa
I rewrote srfi/srfi-64.scm file using cond-expand but don't know it works.
On Guile 2.0, it works;
$ guile -L `pwd` --use-srfi=64 srfi-64-test.scm
Starting test SRFI 64 - Meta-Test Suite (Writing full log to "SRFI
64 - Meta-Test Suite.log")
# of expected passes 51
# of expected f
I fixed some bugs and changed test-error to detect using message string
too because of 'misc-error and 'syntax-error.
For example, "^missing or extra expression" and "^string contains #nul
character" are both 'misc-error.
Example1: just check whether a exception occurs?
scheme@(guile-user)>
Hello, world! :)
I'm a newbie of scheme. I'd heard the testing framework SRFI-64 but failed
to use it on Guile 2.0.
After attempt to solve this problem, I made a guile module to pass the test
suite for SRFI-64 by Donovan Kolbly.
--
1. srfi/srfi-64.scm is a SRFI-64 implementation for
15 matches
Mail list logo
