Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

() Thien-Thi Nguyen () Wed, 02 Mar 2022 19:11:35 -0500 Please see: [...] Just a quick followup: The ‘p’ branch passes "make check" now: https://gitlab.com/restio-al-restio/huge/-/milestones/2#tab-issues This means if you have any long-standing is

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

() "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" () Tue, 09 Mar 2021 08:14:07 +0100 How about taking this at literal value and creating an ugg8-repository: Unofficial GNU Guile 1.8? That carries with it the connotations of keeping to plain, strong values without fundamental changes, and picking up fro

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

Andy Wingo writes: > power to them; perhaps there is room for an unofficial Guile development > branch. Just that again -- and I really hate to be negative here -- I How about taking this at literal value and creating an ugg8-repository: Unofficial GNU Guile 1.8? That carries with it the conno

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

Hi :) On Sun 10 Jan 2021 22:54, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > I would like to work (on the weekends, so as not to intefere w/ > ) on preparation and release of Guile 1.8.9, targeted > for the ides of April (more or less). Humm! I see you have started work here and are pushing to the main release

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:36 PM Massimiliano Gubinelli < m.gubine...@gmail.com> wrote: > Chibi is too slow I'll just mention here that Chibi's file include/chibi/features.h has many feature macros (at the C level) that can be changed to make Chibi smaller/faster: for example, you could disable

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

Hi Massimiliano, Thanks for the needs of TeXmacs this clearly. A few comments below… Massimiliano Gubinelli skribis: > all these three features point to weakness of various possible solutions > > 1) we do not need a Scheme with a lot of OS interfaces, this duplicate > functionalities in QT an

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

> On 30. Jan 2021, at 13:31, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > > Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide mailto:arne_...@web.de>> writes: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis: I would like to work (on the weekends, so as not to intefere w/ ) on preparation and release of Guile

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >>> Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis: >> The message we’re sending is that we don’t leave anyone out in the cold >> who committed to using Guile. > > The mailing lists are evidence enough that users of Guile 1.8 can get > help in migrating to version 2

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis: >>> I would like to work (on the weekends, so as not to intefere w/ >>> ) on preparation and release of Guile 1.8.9, targeted >>> for the ides of April (more or less). >>> >>> Guile 1.8.x users: What ch

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis: >> I would like to work (on the weekends, so as not to intefere w/ >> ) on preparation and release of Guile 1.8.9, targeted >> for the ides of April (more or less). >> >> Guile 1.8.x users: What changes do you want to see in 1.8.9? I am not a

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

Hi! Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis: > I would like to work (on the weekends, so as not to intefere w/ > ) on preparation and release of Guile 1.8.9, targeted > for the ides of April (more or less). > > Guile 1.8.x users: What changes do you want to see in 1.8.9? > > Guile maintainers: Any tips (proces

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

() Massimiliano Gubinelli () Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:55:37 +0100 I was not aware that Guile 1.8 was still "officially" maintained. What is the current status/policy about it? I believe the maintainers have stopped supporting Guile 1.8.x for a while now. I'm not an official maintainer, just s

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

() Mike Gran () Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:51:35 -0800 Guile 1.8.x was rather portable. So my only suggestion is to keep it portable. Good idea. Are there any specific platforms you're interested in? Are there any specific regressions in portability you're interested in avoiding? -- Thien-Thi

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

Hi, I was not aware that Guile 1.8 was still "officially" maintained. What is the current status/policy about it? I'm not sure is appropriate to ask but it would be nice if MinGW (both 32 and 64 bit) could be supported and to have it parallel installable with Guile 2 (and Guile 3). Best reg

Re: rfc: next guile 1.8.x release

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 04:54:38PM -0500, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > > I would like to work (on the weekends, so as not to intefere w/ > ) on preparation and release of Guile 1.8.9, targeted > for the ides of April (more or less). > > Guile 1.8.x users: What changes do you want to see in 1.8.9? H