Re: ice-9 and $GUILE_LOAD_PATH

2008-01-31 Thread Dave Pawson
Hi Neil. Neil Jerram wrote: Yes, indeed, sorry about that. The incorrect doc was in 1.8.1 through 1.8.3, but has been removed now from 1.8.x CVS, so will no longer be misleading people in 1.8.4. Thanks. When's that to be put up on the website please? elisp? Yes. guile-debugging is a sl

Re: ice-9 and $GUILE_LOAD_PATH

2008-01-30 Thread Neil Jerram
Dave Pawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for the reply Mike. > > Mike Gran wrote: >> If I recall correctly, the breakpoint library was split off into a >> separate package. The manual is incorrect. This is a known bug, >> and should be fixed in the next release. Yes, indeed, sorry about

Re: ice-9 and $GUILE_LOAD_PATH

2008-01-30 Thread Dave Pawson
Thanks for the reply Mike. Mike Gran wrote: If I recall correctly, the breakpoint library was split off into a separate package. The manual is incorrect. This is a known bug, and should be fixed in the next release. The separate package lives here, I think. https://gna.org/projects/gui

Re: ice-9 and $GUILE_LOAD_PATH

2008-01-29 Thread Mike Gran
> Dave Pawson wrote: > > New user, Fedora Core, > > Guile at /usr/share/guile/1.8/ > > Reading the manual > > http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html > > > > The debug seems to require ice-9 > > (use-modules (ice-9 debugger breakpoints)) > > > Seemingly resolved? > http://www.gnu.or

Re: ice-9 and $GUILE_LOAD_PATH

2008-01-29 Thread Dave Pawson
Dave Pawson wrote: New user, Fedora Core, Guile at /usr/share/guile/1.8/ Reading the manual http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html The debug seems to require ice-9 (use-modules (ice-9 debugger breakpoints)) Seemingly resolved? http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html#