Op 11-09-2023 om 20:42 schreef Andy Tai:
Is using Guile, or a similar Scheme implementation, to re-implement
make or meson realistic?
Meson seems to have straightforward syntax and semantics, and
‘meson.build’ isn't actually Python code unlike what you might expect,
so I think that a meson r
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>
> I think this already exist in GNU make. Recent versions of it can be
> extended in GNU guile:
This feature is disabled on most distributions AFAIK.
What I meant is a 100% Scheme build system.
Here is a project defintion of mine for Libpatch
On 9/12/23 15:56, Olivier Dion wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Andy Tai wrote:
Is using Guile, or a similar Scheme implementation, to re-implement
make or meson realistic?
By re-implementing do you mean re-writing Make with Guile? That ought
to be realistic, but I really do not see the point of
Hello!
Le mardi 12 septembre 2023 à 09:56 -0400, Olivier Dion a écrit :
> What is more realistic and useful is to make a build system in Guile
> where the DSL that replaces Makefiles is Scheme.
Since make is only a small part of a useful build system, I think it is
way easier to re-implement make
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Andy Tai wrote:
> Is using Guile, or a similar Scheme implementation, to re-implement
> make or meson realistic?
By re-implementing do you mean re-writing Make with Guile? That ought
to be realistic, but I really do not see the point of it.
What is more realistic and useful
