I'm so glad for all the people who intervened in this discussion
As this made the subtleties of the issue clearer.
Thank you people !
2017-07-09 16:49 GMT+02:00 Chris Vine :
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 11:09:25 -0300
> Vítor De Araújo wrote:
>
> unwind-protect is a dynamic-wind without the in guard.
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 11:09:25 -0300
Vítor De Araújo wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 09:59, Chris Vine wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 00:34:13 +0300
> > Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> >> Hm. Python's try/finally has several uses in virtually every
> >> program.
> >>
> >> Trouble is, Scheme's continuations make i
On 09/07/2017 09:59, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 00:34:13 +0300
> Marko Rauhamaa writes:
>> Hm. Python's try/finally has several uses in virtually every
>> program.
>>
>> Trouble is, Scheme's continuations make it impossible to know when
>> something is really final.
>>
>> In fact, i
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 00:34:13 +0300
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> Hm. Python's try/finally has several uses in virtually every
> program.
>
> Trouble is, Scheme's continuations make it impossible to know when
> something is really final.
>
> In fact, implementing coroutines and cooperative multitaski
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
> Amirouche Boubekki :
>
>> I consider dynamic-wind an advanced concept not required for usual
>> hacking.
>
> Hm. Python's try/finally has several uses in virtually every program.
>
> Trouble is, Scheme's continuations make it impossible to know when
> something is really
Amirouche Boubekki :
> I consider dynamic-wind an advanced concept not required for usual
> hacking.
Hm. Python's try/finally has several uses in virtually every program.
Trouble is, Scheme's continuations make it impossible to know when
something is really final. In fact, implementing coroutine
Héllo all!
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:14 AM Catonano wrote:
> My point is that the manual does not a good job of _introducing_ people to
> the concept of dynamic wind
>
> Especially people wo have not clear in mind a complete map of the use cases
> with relative possible solutions.
>
> The manual
Catonano writes:
> Chris,
>
> thank you for your remarks.
>
> Yo're right that I was being caught up by continuations AND that I was
> probably missing the generality of the concept of dynamic wind
>
> And yet, I still want to clarify my point
>
> My point is not that the manual is incomplete or
Chris,
thank you for your remarks.
Yo're right that I was being caught up by continuations AND that I was
probably missing the generality of the concept of dynamic wind
And yet, I still want to clarify my point
My point is not that the manual is incomplete or inaccurate
My point is that the ma
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 08:00:58 +0200
Catonano wrote:
> 2017-06-30 23:48 GMT+02:00 Panicz Maciej Godek
> :
> > It's very simple (at least from the point of view of a user)
> > When it is tempting to write something like
> >
> > (define (within-context action)
> > (enter-context)
> > (action)
> >
Thank you !!
2017-06-30 23:48 GMT+02:00 Panicz Maciej Godek :
>
>
> 2017-06-30 22:33 GMT+02:00 Catonano :
>
>> On the irc channel I was suggested that it might have been a good fit for
>> my use case
>>
>> I took a look at it in the manual
>>
>> I'm perplexed. I don't understand it
>>
>> How is it supposed to
2017-06-30 22:33 GMT+02:00 Catonano :
> On the irc channel I was suggested that it might have been a good fit for
> my use case
>
> I took a look at it in the manual
>
> I'm perplexed. I don't understand it
>
> How is it supposed to be used ?
>
>
It's very simple (at least from the point of view o
13 matches
Mail list logo
