hello Linus,
finally i tested your code with my program and it works.
define worked in if in ssigma-sol-approx
( in
*Preview:*
;; (load "SssRec.scm")
;;(use-modules (syntax define));;(use-modules
(guile/define))(use-modules (guile define))
(include "first-and-rest.scm")(include "list.scm")(i
about :
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Module-System-Reflection.html
i do not want to implement things that are not portable to others schemes
using standart macros and SRFI,
for now my Scheme+ is a set of macros portable to other scheme and use only
SRFI if they are implemente
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 3:36 PM Linus Björnstam
wrote:
> Oh, my version is an error. I implemented the macro before definitions in
> (some) expression contexts were a thing.
>
do you talk about what? the linked code?
>
> Andy did a marvellous thing implementinf the new letrec: if it is
> possibl
i did not noticed there was an attachment link :-(
i read your code, great work...
i will read it more later
Damien
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 5:24 PM Linus Björnstam
wrote:
> I implemented this hack before guile 3 got defines in function bodies:
> https://hg.sr.ht/~bjoli/guile-define
>
> Even I gui
Hi Damien!
The problem that define only defines a variable in the current lexical
environment. Even if a definition in an if block would work from a syntactical
standpoint, it would be pointless.
As per r6rs, internal (define ...) are akin to letrec, but are only allowed in
definition context.
hello, i'm just answering now because my ten years old Mac book pro
definitely died sunday evening RIP
i was trying to make macro that set! variable if they exist or create it
before if the variable is not defined (tested by the Guile procedure
'defined?' which is not R*RS in any version)
but it
Linus Björnstam writes:
> Andy did a marvellous thing
…
> So TL/DR: guiles way is the correct way.
Thank you for the clarification!
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Oh, my version is an error. I implemented the macro before definitions in
(some) expression contexts were a thing.
Andy did a marvellous thing implementinf the new letrec: if it is possible,
letrec will have no overhead. It also automatically handle dependant clauses:
even though it might seem
Linus Björnstam writes:
> becomes ONE letrec under gulie3, whereas my library turns it into
> (letrec ((a 2) (b 3))
> (display "hej")
> (letrec ((c 3))
> (+ a b c)))
>
> That should be an easy fix, again if there is any interest.
I’m not sure which approach I prefer. Your approach is mo
Note however, that I seem to have forgotten when and unless. also: cond has no
support for the extended "test guard => lambda" form. Neither do I believe that
the any "special" case form is supported. If there is any interest whatsoever,
I can implement it when I have time.
The code produced is
I implemented this hack before guile 3 got defines in function bodies:
https://hg.sr.ht/~bjoli/guile-define
Even I guile 3 it allows a more liberal placement of define, but it won't work
for things like bodies of imported macros (like match)
--
Linus Björnstam
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, at 00:27, D
Taylan Kammer writes:
> On 05.06.2021 00:27, Damien Mattei wrote:
>> hello,
>> i'm was considering that i want to be able to define a variable anywhere in
>> code, the way Python do. Few scheme can do that (Bigloo i know)
>> ( the list here is not exact:
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/commen
On 05.06.2021 00:27, Damien Mattei wrote:
> hello,
> i'm was considering that i want to be able to define a variable anywhere in
> code, the way Python do. Few scheme can do that (Bigloo i know)
> ( the list here is not exact:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/b73fdz/placement_of_define_in
13 matches
Mail list logo
