Le 20/03/2021 à 19:10, Linus Björnstam a écrit :
I see!
To be honest, this seems like a guile-1.8ism... I don't think such code would
work for guile2 though 3. Why? Because your are mutating a pointer local to
your procedure, not the actual data pointed to by the music property You are
modif
I see!
To be honest, this seems like a guile-1.8ism... I don't think such code would
work for guile2 though 3. Why? Because your are mutating a pointer local to
your procedure, not the actual data pointed to by the music property You are
modifying the pointer to the list returned by the call, n
Le 20/03/2021 à 17:04, Linus Björnstam a écrit :
Well, mutating like that is not very common, except for maybe with alists.
In which situations are you mutating the list like that? Usually you would
build a reverse list using a recursive function and an accumulator, which can
be done without
Well, mutating like that is not very common, except for maybe with alists.
In which situations are you mutating the list like that? Usually you would
build a reverse list using a recursive function and an accumulator, which can
be done without set! (which has a boxing overhead).
--
Linus Bjö
