On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 07:59:21PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2025 19:47, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 07:03:56PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Typical hashing of the non-cryptographic kind aren't designed to
> > > > virtually eliminate
Spacing appears to have been messed up, so here's the same thing with
extra newlines
On 13/04/2025 18:55, Maxime Devos via General Guile related discussions
wrote:
On 11/04/2025 15:49, Olivier Dion wrote:
My goal here is that I have GOOPS object. The object is used to produce
a pure result
On 13/04/2025 19:47, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 07:03:56PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:
[...]
Typical hashing of the non-cryptographic kind aren't designed to
virtually eliminate hash collisions [...]
Nit: given a "reasonable" hash, the collision probability should be
the
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 07:03:56PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:
[...]
> > Typical hashing of the non-cryptographic kind aren't designed to
> > virtually eliminate hash collisions [...]
Nit: given a "reasonable" hash, the collision probability should be
the same for crypto or non-crypto hash (for t
On 11/04/2025 15:49, Olivier Dion wrote:
My goal here is that I have GOOPS object. The object is used to produce
a pure result which I can store in a cache on the disk, given the hash
of the object. I can then re-fetch the result on disk in another Guile
process if the hashes match. As you c
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:34:37AM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote:
[...]
> I think the definition of equivalent here is that the pure behavior of
> the procedures are the same. Say we're hashing `(lambda (x y) (+ x y))'
> and `(lambda (u v) (+ u v))'. These procedures does not have equivalent
> sour
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 9:50 AM Olivier Dion wrote:
>
> Like mentioned in the comment (look for the `(procedure? value)'
> clause), this does _not_ yield the same hash for a procedure if the
> module where this procedure came from is compiled. And it's not
> possible to pass the proc
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025, Vivien Kraus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le vendredi 11 avril 2025 à 09:49 -0400, Olivier Dion a écrit :
>> But some fields seems to
>> not be taken into account and you will end up with fetching
>> substitute
>> in the store. I want to avoid this element of surprise in my case.
Sid
On 11.04.25 21:49, Olivier Dion wrote:
Hi Guile users!
I have a hashing procedure that can hash many things like so:
(define (hash value)
(cond
((pair? value)
(let loop ((elements value)
(acc (srfi:hash '()))
(k 1))
(if (null? el
Hello,
Le vendredi 11 avril 2025 à 09:49 -0400, Olivier Dion a écrit :
> But some fields seems to
> not be taken into account and you will end up with fetching
> substitute
> in the store. I want to avoid this element of surprise in my case.
>From what I understand, here (problem A), you want to
10 matches
Mail list logo
