Marko Rauhamaa skribis:
> Eli Zaretskii :
>
> From: Marko Rauhamaa
>>> I'd like to produce Guile code that works on Linux. As it stands, I
>>> can't.
>>
>> Of course you can: write it in C and load it via FFI.
>
> Well, for that, I don't even need Guile; all I need is gcc.
>
> It's a bit of
Eli Zaretskii :
From: Marko Rauhamaa
>> I'd like to produce Guile code that works on Linux. As it stands, I
>> can't.
>
> Of course you can: write it in C and load it via FFI.
Well, for that, I don't even need Guile; all I need is gcc.
It's a bit of a lame reason to have to escape out of S
>>> From: Marko Rauhamaa
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:08:23 +0300
>>> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
>>>
>>> Michael Tiedtke :
POSIX isn't that important or useful anymore but "full access to
POSIX system calls" it has never been.
>>> What I'd like is a way to communicate open file descriptors
On 23/06/2015 20:09, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Eli Zaretskii :
From: Marko Rauhamaa
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:08:23 +0300
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Michael Tiedtke :
POSIX isn't that important or useful anymore but "full access to
POSIX system calls" it has never been.
What I'd like is a way to
Eli Zaretskii :
>> From: Marko Rauhamaa
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:08:23 +0300
>> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
>>
>> Michael Tiedtke :
>> > POSIX isn't that important or useful anymore but "full access to
>> > POSIX system calls" it has never been.
>>
>> What I'd like is a way to communicate open f
> From: Marko Rauhamaa
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:08:23 +0300
> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
>
> Michael Tiedtke :
>
> > POSIX isn't that important or useful anymore but "full access to POSIX
> > system calls" it has never been.
>
> What I'd like is a way to communicate open file descriptors between
On 23/06/2015 15:30, Mike Gran wrote:
WOn Tuesday, June 23, 2015 1:04 AM, Michael Tiedtke
wrote:
Now, full access to "POSIX system calls" means more and less than
that. When you want to have a look at my current terminal
application driver you will see it's current shortcomings: missing a
g
WOn Tuesday, June 23, 2015 1:04 AM, Michael Tiedtke
wrote:
> Now, full access to "POSIX system calls" means more and less than
> that. When you want to have a look at my current terminal
> application driver you will see it's current shortcomings: missing a
> general (Linux specific) ioctl primi
Michael Tiedtke :
> POSIX isn't that important or useful anymore but "full access to POSIX
> system calls" it has never been.
What I'd like is a way to communicate open file descriptors between
processes.
Marko
From the manual:
"Guile goes beyond the rather austere language presented in R5RS,
extending it with a module system, full access to POSIX system calls ..."
Now, full access to "POSIX system calls" means more and less than that.
When you want to have a look at my current terminal application d
On 18/06/2015 16:21, Michael Tiedtke wrote:
...
For this I have written a preliminary GOOPS class terminal
() which is attached for those interested having a look at.
...
Just as a side note. You can try this:
(with-output-to-file "sinui0.cat" (lambda () (load "terminal.scm")))
This will
11 matches
Mail list logo
