Mike Gran writes:
> So I went ahead and checked in a working version of
> my constrained REPL plus a constrained environment in the
> (sandy sandy) module found here:
> https://github.com/spk121/guile-web-sandbox/tree/master/module/sandy
"Containerized web repl" — that sounds awesome!
If you wa
Hey all-
It was just by weird coincidence that I was working on something
quite similar to all this for another side project, which is why I
had an answer at hand originally.
So I went ahead and checked in a working version of
my constrained REPL plus a constrained environment in the
(sandy sandy
Ryan Raymond writes:
> Thank you, all. I think it's safe to consider this matter concluded!
Great to hear that — good luck!
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Mike, you are truly a lifesaver. My work uses an in-house programming
language that really is not too great, but now I finally have a chance to
change their minds. Thank you so much! This appears to do exactly what I
need.
Dr. Arne, I will certainly use sandboxed evaluation as you have suggested.
I
Hey Ryan, Mike, Arne,
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 6:48 AM Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
wrote:
>
> Mike Gran writes:
>
> >>good choice. Basically, I want the user to be able to open a repl shell,
> >>but by default it should have *no* bindings except the ones I whitelisted.
> > Define a module in a file
Hi Mike,
Mike Gran writes:
>>good choice. Basically, I want the user to be able to open a repl shell,
>>but by default it should have *no* bindings except the ones I whitelisted.
> Define a module in a file with the "#:pure" option so that it starts off
> empty.
…
> Using the real repl is proba
>Hello, all.
>I've been on this for almost a month now. I'm working on a project for my
>work, where we need a console to control automation. I wanted to use an
>existing language instead of developing one, and I thought Guile would be a
>good choice. Basically, I want the user to be able to open a
