Thank you guys, I got it through.
Best,
Yijiang
2013/5/29 Mike Gran :
>>Hi guys,
>
>
>>I'm using a very simple smob which only carries a pointer in the
>>immediate word. It works fine, but what worries me is that the free
>>function seems never called. Am I doing anything wrong? What's the
>>
Mike Gran skribis:
> So, it is probably not really a Guile bug, but, rather, that calling
> scm_gc from within atexit() is a bad idea.
Oh, OK. In general, I wouldn’t make any strong assumption as to
when/whether a SMOB free function will be called.
Ludo’.
> Mike Gran skribis:
>> 3. Some versions of Guile have a bug where the last smob defined
>> in your program is never freed, even if you've cleared out the
>> pointers and called scm_gc.
> What is this? I’d be happy to read more details. :-)
To be more specific, if you want to make sure the G
Mike Gran skribis:
> 3. Some versions of Guile have a bug where the last smob defined
> in your program is never freed, even if you've cleared out the
> pointers and called scm_gc.
What is this? I’d be happy to read more details. :-)
Ludo’.
>Hi guys,
>I'm using a very simple smob which only carries a pointer in the
>immediate word. It works fine, but what worries me is that the free
>function seems never called. Am I doing anything wrong? What's the
>standard way of making such kind of smob?
What you are doing is mostly right,
2013/5/29 Sun Yijiang
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm using a very simple smob which only carries a pointer in the
> immediate word. It works fine, but what worries me is that the free
> function seems never called. Am I doing anything wrong? What's the
> standard way of making such kind of smob?
>
> C++
Hi guys,
I'm using a very simple smob which only carries a pointer in the
immediate word. It works fine, but what worries me is that the free
function seems never called. Am I doing anything wrong? What's the
standard way of making such kind of smob?
C++ code listed below:
--
