On Mon 13 Mar 2017 00:20, Matt Wette writes:
> If lilypond is performing a lot of eval or lambda generation would turning
> off optimization help?
>
> (compile expr #:opts ‘(#:partial-eval? #f #:cse? #f))
I think Lilypond is currently not going through the compiler at all, so
no partial
If lilypond is performing a lot of eval or lambda generation would turning off
optimization help?
(compile expr #:opts ‘(#:partial-eval? #f #:cse? #f))
Matt
Thomas Morley skribis:
> Let me add, I'd be interested in examples of cross-compiled
> applications having already done so, as well.
It boils down to having a makefile rule along the lines of:
%.go: %.scm
guild compile --target="$(host)" -o $@ $<
where $host is the cross-compilatio
Hi,
2017-03-09 13:13 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès :
> Hello,
>
> Thomas Morley skribis:
>
>> Btw, I've improved my local setup to be able to test lilypond more
>> quickly with different guile versions. Though I wasn't able to compile
>> 1.8.8, neither from the repository nor from the tarball downloa
On 03/10/2017 11:18 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Thanks. As Andy wrote in that thread, it would be beneficial if
LilyPond could pre-compile as much as possible of its core Scheme code.
Hi, Yeah, it seems like that would be the next step in addressing the
performance questions. That brings up
Paul skribis:
> On 03/09/2017 07:13 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> What fraction of the Scheme code being run for this benchmark is
>> pre-compiled (as a .go file)?
>
> I don't think any of LilyPond's Scheme code is pre-compiled at this point...
>
> Yep, as David Kastrup wrote in the "GNU Guile
On 03/09/2017 07:13 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
What fraction of the Scheme code being run for this benchmark is pre-compiled
(as a .go file)?
I don't think any of LilyPond's Scheme code is pre-compiled at this point...
Yep, as David Kastrup wrote in the "GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta)" thre
Hello,
Thomas Morley skribis:
> Btw, I've improved my local setup to be able to test lilypond more
> quickly with different guile versions. Though I wasn't able to compile
> 1.8.8, neither from the repository nor from the tarball downloaded
> from
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/download/
>
() Thomas Morley
() Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:17:12 +0100
Btw, I've improved my local setup to be able to test lilypond
more quickly with different guile versions. Though I wasn't
able to compile 1.8.8, neither from the repository
Strange, because the repo should have...
nor from the tar
Thomas Morley writes:
> So guile 2.1.7 is indeed faster than 2.0.14 with this test-file, otoh
> I've redone testings with the other file and can confirm 2.1.7 being
> slower there.
> Currently I've no clue why.
Lot's of output? The output files are generated in
lily/paper-outputter.cc with
2017-03-06 21:41 GMT+01:00 Andy Wingo :
> On Sun 05 Mar 2017 15:01, Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Here some timing values
>>
>> (1)
>> lilypond-2.19.52 using guile 1.8.7
>> (I would have prefered to build lilypond with a guile-1.8.8 build from
>> the guile-repository. Though my try to build it from t
On Sun 05 Mar 2017 15:01, Thomas Morley writes:
> Here some timing values
>
> (1)
> lilypond-2.19.52 using guile 1.8.7
> (I would have prefered to build lilypond with a guile-1.8.8 build from
> the guile-repository. Though my try to build it from the
> branch_release-1-8 failed. Instead attemptin
12 matches
Mail list logo
