[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> In short, the lesson is: one should use `make-class' (although
> it's undocumented) rather than `(make ...)' when instantiating a
> new class.
Apologies for not playing earlier, but for the record I agree that
this is the right answer. The GOOPS cod
Hi,
Nobody won the prize, because nobody gave the correct answer. For those
of you who played, I'm giving the correct answer below. ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> (use-modules (oop goops))
> (read-set! keywords 'prefix)
>
> (define-class ()
> (the-slot :init-value
Hi,
"Pat Lasswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 9/26/06, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (define-method (make-instance (c ))
> (format (current-error-port) "make-instance (~a)~%" c)
> (next-method))
> Try adding a '. initargs' after '(c )'.
I shouldn't be needed and it
On 9/26/06, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (define-method (make-instance (c ))
(format (current-error-port) "make-instance (~a)~%" c)(next-method))Try adding a '. initargs' after '(c )'.cheerspatOn 9/26/06,
Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,I'm trying to "dynamical
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> guile> (define c (make-a-class 'some-name))
> guile> (define obj (make c))
> guile> obj
> #< some-name deadbeef>
This should rather be: #.
> This is quite unexpected since I would expect, at least, the
> `initialize' class for instances
Hi,
I'm trying to "dynamically" create classes which I would then like to
instantiate. The behavior I would like to achieve is that:
guile> (define c (make-a-class 'some-name))
guile> (define obj (make c))
guile> obj
#< some-name deadbeef>
To that purpose, I have a metaclass named `' an
