Re: Bit vectors read syntax

2005-10-24 Thread Kevin Ryde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > Oh, right. Sorry about that. It turns out that I have both manuals > (Info files) installed and I sometimes get to read the wrong one... I removed it from the upcoming 1.6.8. Making all doc changes in both branches is too much like hard work, but

Re: Bit vectors read syntax

2005-10-24 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's only in the 1.6 manual isn't it? Oh, right. Sorry about that. It turns out that I have both manuals (Info files) installed and I sometimes get to read the wrong one... Thanks, Ludovic. ___ Guile-user

Re: Bit vectors read syntax

2005-10-21 Thread Kevin Ryde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > The manual (1.7) mentions two read syntaxes for bit vectors: > >#b(#t #f #t) => >#*101 That's only in the 1.6 manual isn't it? > In fact, `scm_lreadr ()' does not seem to implement it. So should the > `#b()' read syntax be removed from the

Bit vectors read syntax

2005-10-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, The manual (1.7) mentions two read syntaxes for bit vectors: (make-uniform-vector 8 #t #f) => #* #b(#t #f #t) => #*101 In 1.7 the `#*' syntax works fine but the `#b()' doesn't: guile> #b(#f #t #f) ERROR: In procedure scm_lreadr: ERROR: standard input:5:3: Unknown