On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 22:16 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> "Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In the first episode I asked for some help to
> > complete my Guile binding to OpenSSL, which I have
> > to admit is not much fun to code.
>
> Out of interest, what happened with that, and
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 10:57 -0500, Aaron VanDevender wrote:
> I notice that if I run:
>
> $ guile -c '(display (strftime "%c %z\n" (localtime (current-time'
> Thu Jun 22 10:51:21 2006 +0500
On second thought, I think this patch is better since in keeps the
sch
I notice that if I run:
$ guile -c '(display (strftime "%c %z\n" (localtime (current-time'
Thu Jun 22 10:51:21 2006 +0500
But I live at -0500 (CDT), not +500. The following patch fixes it:
Index: stime.c
===
RCS file: /sources/
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 10:57 +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> The autoconf philosophy is usually not to check version numbers
> explicitly if it can be avoided, better to check for desired
> feature(s).
>
> Since guile is interpreted you can do a lot at runtime instead of
> worrying about it during conf
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 01:17 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> > +GUILE_CHECK([GUILE_CORRECT_VERSION_P],
> > +[(exit (let loop ((v1 (map string->number (string-split (version)
> > (string-ref \".\" 0
> > + (v2 (map string->number (string-split \"$1\" (string-ref
> > \".\" 0)
>
>
Here is a slightly improved version of my guile.m4 patch. It has some
more explicit comments and uses the guile executable set by GUILE_PROGS
Index: guile.m4
===
RCS file: /sources/guile/guile/guile-core/guile-config/guile.m4,v
retrie
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 23:27 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Yes, sounds like it. Is your most recent patch still how you think
> this should be done?
I think we should apply both my pkg-config patch as well as this patch,
which fixes the RETVAL situation, and adds a macro for checking the
version exp
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 09:42 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> For instance, you could use the following tests within your `configure.ac':
>
> GUILE_PROGS
> GUILE_CHECK_RETVAL([correct_version_p],
> [(exit (string>=? (version) "1.6.7"))])
The guile.m4 that is currently in CVS has a comment a
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 15:42 -0400, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 11:05 -0500, Aaron VanDevender wrote:
> > Are there any plans to add pkg-config support to guile?
>
> IIRC the replacement should have all of the variables that guile-config
> has, and
Are there any plans to add pkg-config support to guile?
Is there a better way to do autoconf tests for guile versions that hacks
like this:
GUILE_VERSION = `$GUILE --version | head -1 | cut -d ' ' -f 2`
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plead the First.
___
Gu
The Guile 1.8 documentation makes reference to some documentation on how
to create extensions using libtool.
(section 2.3.4 refers to
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.8/libtool/index.html#Top)
But this documentation doesn't actually exist. Does anyone have even a
sketchy HOWTO or a
Paul,
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 14:27 +, Paul Emsley wrote:
> Libtool (or at least libltdl) has become a dependency of guile.
> I don't have /usr/lib/libltdl.so on my system (Fedora Core 4), so the
> configure failed (stopped as it should have done).
FC4 has libltdl. You just need to say:
yum i
-0600, Aaron VanDevender wrote:
> Is guile-gnome a dead project? It has been almost a year since the last
> release, and there hasn't been much traffic on the guile-gnome list. Is
> anyone planning a gtk2 based version of gulie-gtk and guile-gnome?
>
> The last version doesn&
Is guile-gnome a dead project? It has been almost a year since the last
release, and there hasn't been much traffic on the guile-gnome list. Is
anyone planning a gtk2 based version of gulie-gtk and guile-gnome?
The last version doesn't even build on my system because it uses
autoconf macros which
What about the gnu-lightning stuff in the guile cvs tree? Isn't that
supposed to be a JIT/VM for guile?
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 13:14 +, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Leonardo Lopes Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would like to know if there is any Just-in-time compiler related
> > resourse
Hello,
I have noticed that guile evaluates the following to #t
(case 'x
('x #t)
(else #f))
even though R5RS section 4.2.1 seems to say that all of the statements
(besides else) must be of the form ((datum ...) ...). Clearly the symbol
'x is not a list. What is going on here? Is this an agree
16 matches
Mail list logo