Recently I've heard about Starlark, which is described as "Starlark is a
dialect of Python. Like Python, it is a dynamically typed language with
high-level data types, first-class functions with lexical scope, and
garbage collection."
I think it could be easier than implementing original Python.
h
If you just want to run the .go file, this is not a good way to go, since
it's binary format inside ELF can be changed in different Guile version.
And Guile compiler will handle these issues for you. So best practice is to
always run from a script and let Guile do the rest for you.
But if you real
Hi Keith!
AOT stands for "Ahead-of-Time," and in this context, it refers to the
process of compiling source code directly into native machine code,
allowing the program to be executed as a regular binary file without
requiring a runtime interpreter.
@Hakan
The current .go file will be generated an
Nala Ginrut writes:
> The current Guile is not AOT yet.
Google says: Attack On Titan.
> Although the object file is ELF, it's just bytecode wrapped ELF
> header. So you can't run it as a regular executable file.
I don't think that was the question...Hakan wants to call the
Guile executable and
Hi Hakan!
The current Guile is not AOT yet. Although the object file is ELF, it's
just bytecode wrapped ELF header. So you can't run it as a regular
executable file.
Best regards.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024, 07:35 Hakan Candar via General Guile related
discussions wrote:
> Dear Guile Users,
>
> I am
Dear Guile Users,
I am unable to run guile objects directly from the command line. I inspected
the manual
thoroughly, however I did not see any mention of my desired action. Is it
possible to execute
guile objects directly, or are they reserved for internal caching mechanism
only?
I tried the
