> the problem when pre-compiling/pre-computing those lists is that with #' ,
> i mean syntax, the optimizer-parse-square-brackets-arguments-lister no
> more receive lists but this sort of expression:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define T (make-vector 7))
> scheme@(guile-user)> {T[2 + 1] <- 7}
> <- :
Hi,
Thanks, Nala!
> I'm not familiar with Xapian, is it possible to do similar things as
> VectorDB?
I am not very familiar with VectorDB. From what I can tell, Xapian and
VectorDB seem to have similar application areas, but Xapian takes a lot
simpler and more traditional approach. You can fin
i understand the problem i have now in this new version, it is in the
features of SRFI 105 :
$brackett-apply$ $nfx$ and more that deals with [ ] , infix where i need to
parse for operator precedence
i have procedure for that: optimizer-parse-square-brackets-arguments-lister
it takes a list in inf
Hello!
This is an interesting approach, thank you.
Le vendredi 10 mai 2024 à 09:47 +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide a
écrit :
> │ ;; get the result
> │ (let ((res (helper)))
> │ ;; typecheck the result
> │ (unless (ret? res)
> │ (error "type error: return val
Hi. I'm writing a custom module system that avoids the standard
search path and list-of-symbols naming scheme. Instead of using
use-modules and define-module, I have a roughly similar procedure,
let's call it my-load, that creates a module with make-module and
loads a file into it with primitive-
