Ognen Duzlevski writes:
> I considered embedding a scheme interpreter into a kernel for fun (!)
> but even then (non-commercial interest), I only thought of kernels that
> are actually used by others ;)
There actually are people using the Hurd. Not many, but some. And with
Guix, the hurd is jus
Could elaborate on it?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022, 15:01 Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> Let’s be honest: it wasn’t widened, but shifted. I don’t think today’s
> Guile is a good fit for an extension language.
>
> Regards,
> Jean
>
>
Jean Abou Samra writes:
>> Le 24 juin 2022 à 03:13, Nala Ginrut a écrit :
>>
>> Agreed, Guile's design was widened.
> Let’s be honest: it wasn’t widened, but shifted. I don’t think today’s Guile
> is a good fit for an extension language.
Why? Which change caused it to not be good as extens
> Le 24 juin 2022 à 03:13, Nala Ginrut a écrit :
>
> Agreed, Guile's design was widened.
Let’s be honest: it wasn’t widened, but shifted. I don’t think today’s Guile is
a good fit for an extension language.
Regards,
Jean
> But I think we are talking about
> different "low-level", for H
