release notes:
Tested w/ Guile-SDL 0.6.1 (and Guile 2.2.7).
README excerpt:
This is a collection of small programs released
under GNU GPL v3 that use Guile-SDL.
NEWS for 6.0 (2022-03-12):
- minimal Guile-SDL required: Guile-SDL 0.6.1
This is mainly for the benefit of new demo pro
On Sat, 12 Mar 2022 00:10:36 +
Chris Vine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:49:53 +0100
> Maxime Devos wrote:
> > Chris Vine schreef op vr 11-03-2022 om 18:13 [+]:
> > > code has changed. I have yet to re-equip my tests to test the write and
> > > display procedures,
> >
> > Those aren't
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:49:53 +0100
Maxime Devos wrote:
> Chris Vine schreef op vr 11-03-2022 om 18:13 [+]:
> > code has changed. I have yet to re-equip my tests to test the write and
> > display procedures,
>
> Those aren't rewritten in Scheme (yet?).
I believe not. Unfortunately this kind
Hi, I want to display the help of an application on Yelp when users click on
"MenuButton → Help" or when they press F1. I already have the relevant actions
connected to a procedure that looks like this:
(define (on-help action app)
#| Show application manual in Yelp. |#
(let [(window (get-ac
"Artyom V. Poptsov" writes:
> A transition table can be verified and checked for dead-ends and
> infinite loops. Also Guile-SMC FSMs gather statistics when they run.
…
> ** Add =guile-standalone= compilation target
>This compilation target produces GNU Guile FSM code in a single file that
>
The guile manual:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-2.2/guile-ref/SLIB-installation.html
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/SLIB-installation.html
says
ln -s /usr/local/lib/slib /usr/local/share/guile/2.2/slib
ln -s /usr/local/lib/slib /usr/local/share/guile
Mikael Djurfeldt writes:
> Hi Greg!
>
> The procedure module-export-all! was introduced in 2.0.1.
>
> It appears that the guile.init (which is distributed with slib, not guile)
> which you are using requires guile 2.0.1.
Thanks for replying.
Sorry, I wasn't precise and meant the 2.0 branch, an
Chris Vine schreef op vr 11-03-2022 om 18:13 [+]:
> Interestingly the read procedure remains unsafe in guile-2.2.6, but
> seems to be safe in guile-3.0.8 even though I cannot see what in the
This is probably due to the rewrite of the 'read' procedure in Scheme
(see module/ice-9/read.scm (canno
Chris Vine schreef op vr 11-03-2022 om 18:13 [+]:
> code has changed. I have yet to re-equip my tests to test the write and
> display procedures,
Those aren't rewritten in Scheme (yet?).
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Awesome, thank you! Is the latest guile-ini release compatible with this
version?
Aleix
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:15 AM Artyom V. Poptsov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm pleased to announce Guile State Machine Compiler (Guile-SMC), version
> 0.4.0:
> https://github.com/artyom-poptsov/guile-smc/relea
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce Guile State Machine Compiler (Guile-SMC), version
0.4.0:
https://github.com/artyom-poptsov/guile-smc/releases/tag/v0.4.0
* What is Guile-SMC?
Guile-SMC is a state machine compiler that allows to describe finite
state machines (FSMs) in Scheme in terms of transit
Hi Greg!
The procedure module-export-all! was introduced in 2.0.1.
It appears that the guile.init (which is distributed with slib, not guile)
which you are using requires guile 2.0.1.
Best regards,
Mikael
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 2:56 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Yes, I know guile 2.0 is old. Ho
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:26:50 +
Chris Vine wrote:
> Notable procedures which it appears remain as non-suspendable are
> get-bytevector-all, get-string-n, read, write and display, but to be
> sure about the first two of those I would also need to read the source
> again. A few years ago I had s
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 09:58:59 -0500
> Olivier Dion wrote:
>> I'm not sure this is related to the functions themself but instead the
>> underlying filedescriptor opened iwth ON_NONBLOCK?
>
> The problem I am referring to is different: it is that delimited
>
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 09:58:59 -0500
Olivier Dion wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, Chris Vine wrote:
[snip]
> > Avoid using get-bytevector-n!, get-bytevector-some and
> > get-bytevector-all if you are going to use something like fibers or
> > some other asynchronous i/o, as those procedures are not su
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Olivier Dion via General Guile related discussions schreef op do 10-03-
> 2022 om 18:46 [-0500]:
>> I haven't check the implementation details, but I think it's just a
>> question of buffering. `get-bytevector-n` will block just like
>> `get-bytevector-s
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 18:46:34 -0500
> Olivier Dion via General Guile related discussions
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
>>
>> > Just one question: Why is get-bytevector-some better than
>> > get-bytevector-n and specifying a num
Olivier Dion via General Guile related discussions schreef op do 10-03-
2022 om 18:46 [-0500]:
> I haven't check the implementation details, but I think it's just a
> question of buffering. `get-bytevector-n` will block just like
> `get-bytevector-some` when the port is empty. The former will ret
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 18:46:34 -0500
Olivier Dion via General Guile related discussions
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
>
> > Just one question: Why is get-bytevector-some better than
> > get-bytevector-n and specifying a number of bytes?
>
> I haven't check the implementat
19 matches
Mail list logo
