Guile-SDL Demos 5.2 available

release notes: Tested w/ Guile-SDL 0.5.3 (and Guile 2.2.7). README excerpt: This is a collection of small programs released under GNU GPL v3 that use Guile-SDL. NEWS for 5.2 (2021-12-18): - bugfixes - SRFI 9 and 17 infelicity corrected Demo ‘mars-rescue’ uses SRFI 9 and SR

Re: [EXT] Can guile be implementation independent?

Hi Jacob, On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:43 PM Jacob Hrbek wrote: > > I am used to working with common lisp where i can write code that is > "implementation independent" meaning that following a specific coding > style makes it compatible across multiple interpretators/compilers > (sbcl, LispWorks, et

Re: Can guile be implementation independent?

>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, 09:43 Jacob Hrbek wrote: >>>Is there a way to do the same on GNU Guile? Like writing a code >>>that can >>>be interpreted by implementations that are following the IEEE >>>1178-2008 >>>or R7RS standard? >> On 12/17/21 03:53, Nala Ginrut wrote: >>> Hi J

Re: How to capture pid of (system process?

Hi Jacob, Jacob Hrbek writes: >> If you want to do things asynchronuously, you can look at >> open-pipe. It should also be possible to build anything you want with >> the lower-level fork, execl, dup->fdes, ... primitives (assuming >> things are single-threaded). > > Can you elaborate? (I am noo

Re: Can guile be implementation independent?

Jacob Hrbek schreef op vr 17-12-2021 om 01:42 [+]: > I am used to working with common lisp where i can write code that is > "implementation independent" meaning that following a specific coding > style makes it compatible across multiple interpretators/compilers > (sbcl, LispWorks, etc..) > >

Re: Can guile be implementation independent?

Uncertain if anymore but Guile provides list of r7rs incompatiblities here Silas > On 17 Dec 2021, at 03:01, Jacob Hrbek wrote: > > Looks interesting, are there any known limitations in relation to Guile? > > On