Re: SRFI 106 "basic socket interface" in Guile

2021-10-24 Thread Maxime Devos
Tim Lee schreef op ma 25-10-2021 om 02:59 [+]: > I noticed that Guile does not implement SRFI 106 (basic socket > interface) > (https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-106/srfi-106.html). Is there a > fundamental reason for the omission? I'm just wondering whether or > not > Guile has all the socket pri

Re: SRFI 106 "basic socket interface" in Guile

2021-10-24 Thread Nala Ginrut
To my experience on implementing the server-core of Artanis with pure Guile. I think srfi 106 could be mostly covered by the current Guile. However, I'm not sure about some options as constants. Best regards. On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, 13:57 Tim Lee wrote: > I noticed that Guile does not implement

SRFI 106 "basic socket interface" in Guile

2021-10-24 Thread Tim Lee
I noticed that Guile does not implement SRFI 106 (basic socket interface) (https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-106/srfi-106.html). Is there a fundamental reason for the omission? I'm just wondering whether or not Guile has all the socket primitives needed to implement SRFI 106.

Re: Is it possible to expand syntax inside match?

2021-10-24 Thread Maxime Devos
Михаил Бахтерев schreef op zo 24-10-2021 om 11:49 [+0500]: > Greetings! > > I wondering, if is it possible to implement something like > this? > > (define-syntax R (syntax-rules () ((_ r v l) #(red r v l > (define-syntax B (syntax-rules () ((_ r v l) #(black r v l > > (define red-black-s

Re: Thanks all!

2021-10-24 Thread Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
paul writes: > I have just made a release of my app [1] which integrates a Guile > runtime -- since i received invaluable pointers from this mailing > list, i thought folks might be curious as to what i was building. … > 1. Spotiqueue on Github, https://github.com/toothbrush/Spotiqueue Very co